The tiff_document_render() and tiff_document_get_thumbnail() functions in the TIFF document backend in GNOME Evince through 3.32.0 did not h
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 73% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: gdk-pixbuf2 (AlmaLinux:8) 2.36.12-5.el8; gdk-pixbuf2-devel (AlmaLinux:8) 2.36.12-5.el8; gdk-pixbuf2-modules (AlmaLinux:8) 2.36.12-5.el8.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to gdk-pixbuf2 (AlmaLinux:8) 2.36.12-5.el8; gdk-pixbuf2-devel (AlmaLinux:8) 2.36.12-5.el8; gdk-pixbuf2-modules (AlmaLinux:8) 2.36.12-5.el8 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The tiff_document_render() and tiff_document_get_thumbnail() functions in the TIFF document backend in GNOME Evince through 3.32.0 did not handle errors from TIFFReadRGBAImageOriented(), leading to uninitialized memory use when processing certain TIFF image files.
- Published
- Apr 22, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.4% · 73th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-754
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.4%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gnome | evince | cpe:2.3:a:gnome:evince |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server tus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_tus |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.10
- canonical ubuntu linux19.04
- debian debian linux10.0
- debian debian linux8.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- fedoraproject fedora29
- fedoraproject fedora30
- gnome evinceup to 3.32.0 inclusive
- opensuse leap15.0
- opensuse leap15.1
- redhat enterprise linux8.0
- redhat enterprise linux eus8.1
- redhat enterprise linux eus8.2
- redhat enterprise linux eus8.4
- redhat enterprise linux eus8.6
- redhat enterprise linux server aus8.2
- redhat enterprise linux server aus8.4
- redhat enterprise linux server aus8.6
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | gdk-pixbuf2 | before 2.36.12-5.el8 | 2.36.12-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | gdk-pixbuf2-devel | before 2.36.12-5.el8 | 2.36.12-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | gdk-pixbuf2-modules | before 2.36.12-5.el8 | 2.36.12-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | gdk-pixbuf2-xlib | before 2.36.12-5.el8 | 2.36.12-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | gdk-pixbuf2-xlib-devel | before 2.36.12-5.el8 | 2.36.12-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | gnome-desktop3 | before 3.32.2-1.el8 | 3.32.2-1.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | gnome-desktop3-devel | before 3.32.2-1.el8 | 3.32.2-1.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | libpurple | before 2.13.0-5.el8 | 2.13.0-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | libpurple-devel | before 2.13.0-5.el8 | 2.13.0-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | pidgin | before 2.13.0-5.el8 | 2.13.0-5.el8 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | pidgin-devel | before 2.13.0-5.el8 | 2.13.0-5.el8 |
| Debian:12 | atril | before 1.22.3-1 | 1.22.3-1 |
| Debian:12 | evince | before 3.32.0-3 | 3.32.0-3 |
| Debian:8 | atril | before 1.8.1+dfsg1-4+deb8u2 | 1.8.1+dfsg1-4+deb8u2 |
| Debian:8 | evince | before 3.14.1-2+deb8u3 | 3.14.1-2+deb8u3 |
| Debian:9 | evince | before 3.22.1-3+deb9u2 | 3.22.1-3+deb9u2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | evince | before 3.26.0+20180128.1bd86963-lp151.4.3.1 | 3.26.0+20180128.1bd86963-lp151.4.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | evince | before 40.4-1.3 | 40.4-1.3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | evince | before 0:3.28.2-9.el7 | 0:3.28.2-9.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | evince-browser-plugin | before 0:3.28.2-9.el7 | 0:3.28.2-9.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | evince-debuginfo | before 0:3.28.2-9.el7 | 0:3.28.2-9.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | evince-devel | before 0:3.28.2-9.el7 | 0:3.28.2-9.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | evince-dvi | before 0:3.28.2-9.el7 | 0:3.28.2-9.el7 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::client | evince-libs | before 0:3.28.2-9.el7 | 0:3.28.2-9.el7 |
+96
Same product
gnome: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-1000083backend/comics/comics-document.c (aka the comic book backend) in GNOME Evince before 3.24.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary com46Plan
- CVE-2019-1010006Evince 3.26.0 is affected by buffer overflow.32Monitor
- CVE-2017-1000159Command injection in evince via filename when printing to PDF.31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2011-0433Nov 19, 2012 · Heap-based buffer overflow in the linetoken function in afmparse.c in t1lib, as used in teTeX 3.0.x, GNOME evince, and possibly other produc28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2013-3718Nov 1, 2019 · evince is missing a check on number of pages which can lead to a segmentation fault22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:gdk-pixbuf2 | 2.36.12-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gdk-pixbuf2-devel | 2.36.12-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gdk-pixbuf2-modules | 2.36.12-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gdk-pixbuf2-xlib | 2.36.12-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gdk-pixbuf2-xlib-devel | 2.36.12-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gnome-desktop3 | 3.32.2-1.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:gnome-desktop3-devel | 3.32.2-1.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:libpurple | 2.13.0-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:libpurple-devel | 2.13.0-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:pidgin | 2.13.0-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:pidgin-devel | 2.13.0-5.el8 · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:atril | 1.22.3-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:evince | 3.32.0-3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:evince | 3.26.0+20180128.1bd86963-lp151.4.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:accountsservice | 0:0.6.50-7.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:accountsservice-debuginfo | 0:0.6.50-7.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:accountsservice-debugsource | 0:0.6.50-7.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:accountsservice-libs | 0:0.6.50-7.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:accountsservice-libs-debuginfo | 0:0.6.50-7.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:appstream-data | 0:8-20190805.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:baobab | 0:3.28.0-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:baobab-debuginfo | 0:3.28.0-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:SDL | 0:1.2.15-35.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:SDL-debuginfo | 0:1.2.15-35.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:SDL-debugsource | 0:1.2.15-35.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:SDL-devel | 0:1.2.15-35.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:gdk-pixbuf2 | 0:2.36.12-5.el8 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:gnome-desktop3 | 0:3.32.2-1.el8 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:pango | 0:1.42.4-6.el8 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:pidgin | 0:2.13.0-5.el8 · Rocky Linux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
+1
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-20-905 · Oct 30, 2020(OpenShift Güvenlik Güncellemesi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-754 · Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional ConditionsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00089.html
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3553
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00013.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00014.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7LU4YZK5S46TZAH4J3NYYUYFMOC47LJG/
- lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YJ6R7NMY44IHIQIY24CV3WV2GLGJPQPZ/
- seclists.org/bugtraq/2020/Feb/18
- usn.ubuntu.com/3959-1/
- www.debian.org/security/2020/dsa-4624
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.