Improper countermeasure against clickjacking attack in client certificates management screen was discovered in Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 t
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.60% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Improper countermeasure against clickjacking attack in client certificates management screen was discovered in Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 to 3.1.8, that allows remote attackers to trick a user to delete the registered client certificate.
- Published
- Jan 9, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 47th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1021
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cybozu | remote service manager | cpe:2.3:a:cybozu:remote_service_manager |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cybozu remote service manager3.0.0 and later · up to 3.1.8 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (jpcert). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cybozu, Inc. Cybozu Remote Service
- 3.0.0 to 3.1.8affected
Same product
cybozu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-16171Directory traversal vulnerability in Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 to 3.1.8 allows remote attackers to execute Java code file on the server vi36Monitor
- CVE-2021-20795Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the management screen of Cybozu Remote Service 3.1.8 to 3.1.9 allows a remote attacker to35Monitor
- CVE-2018-16169Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 to 3.1.0 allows remote authenticated attackers to upload and execute Java code file on the server via unspecifie35Monitor
- CVE-2018-16170Directory traversal vulnerability in Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 to 3.1.8 for Windows allows remote authenticated attackers to read arbitrar33Monitor
- CVE-2014-7266Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in Cybozu Remote Service Manager through 2.3.0 and 3.x through 3.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a32Monitor
- CVE-2014-1983Unspecified vulnerability in Cybozu Remote Service Manager through 2.3.0 and 3.x before 3.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of s32Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1021 · Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or FramesCVSS vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- ClickjackingCAPEC-103likelihood: Medium · High
- Flash File OverlayCAPEC-181Medium
- iFrame OverlayCAPEC-222likelihood: Medium · High
- Task ImpersonationCAPEC-504likelihood: Medium · High
- TapjackingCAPEC-506likelihood: Low · Low
- Cross Frame Scripting (XFS)CAPEC-587High
- Credential Prompt ImpersonationCAPEC-654likelihood: Medium · High
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.