It was found Ceph versions before 13.2.4 that authenticated ceph users with read only permissions could steal dm-crypt encryption keys used
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.49% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ceph (Debian:12) 12.2.11+dfsg1-1; ceph (Debian:8) 0.80.7-2+deb8u3; ceph (Debian:9) 10.2.11-2+deb9u1.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 3.5, NVD 5.7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ceph (Debian:12) 12.2.11+dfsg1-1; ceph (Debian:8) 0.80.7-2+deb8u3; ceph (Debian:9) 10.2.11-2+deb9u1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
It was found Ceph versions before 13.2.4 that authenticated ceph users with read only permissions could steal dm-crypt encryption keys used in ceph disk encryption.
- Published
- Jan 15, 2019
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 40th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-285
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.7
- CNA · redhat
- 3.5
- 2.2 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | ceph | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ceph |
| redhat | ceph storage | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ceph_storage |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.10
- canonical ubuntu linux19.04
- debian debian linux8.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- opensuse leap15.0
- redhat cephbefore 13.2.4
- redhat ceph storage2.0
- redhat ceph storage3.0
- redhat enterprise linux server7.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
[UNKNOWN] ceph
- 13.2.4affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | ceph | before 12.2.11+dfsg1-1 | 12.2.11+dfsg1-1 |
| Debian:8 | ceph | before 0.80.7-2+deb8u3 | 0.80.7-2+deb8u3 |
| Debian:9 | ceph | before 10.2.11-2+deb9u1 | 10.2.11-2+deb9u1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | ceph | before 13.2.4.125+gad802694f5-lp150.2.3.1 | 13.2.4.125+gad802694f5-lp150.2.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | ceph-test | before 13.2.4.125+gad802694f5-lp150.2.3.1 | 13.2.4.125+gad802694f5-lp150.2.3.1 |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-ansible | before 0:3.2.24-1.el7cp | 0:3.2.24-1.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-base | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-common | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-debuginfo | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-fuse | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-iscsi-config | before 0:2.6-19.el7cp | 0:2.6-19.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-mds | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-mgr | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-mon | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-osd | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-radosgw | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-selinux | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | ceph-test | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | cephmetrics | before 0:2.0.6-1.el7cp | 0:2.0.6-1.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | cephmetrics-ansible | before 0:2.0.6-1.el7cp | 0:2.0.6-1.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | libcephfs-devel | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | libcephfs2 | before 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp |
| Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | libntirpc | before 0:1.7.4-1.el7cp | 0:1.7.4-1.el7cp |
+22
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-25660A flaw was found in the Cephx authentication protocol in versions before 15.2.6 and before 14.2.14, where it does not verify Ceph clients co35Monitor
- CVE-2022-3650A privilege escalation flaw was found in Ceph.31Monitor
- CVE-2018-7262In Ceph before 12.2.3 and 13.x through 13.0.1, the rgw_civetweb.cc RGWCivetWeb::init_env function in radosgw doesn't handle malformed HTTP h31Monitor
- CVE-2024-47866RGW DoS attack with empty HTTP header in S3 object copy30Monitor
- CVE-2018-16889Ceph does not properly sanitize encryption keys in debug logging for v4 auth.30Monitor
- CVE-2020-27781User credentials can be manipulated and stolen by Native CephFS consumers of OpenStack Manila, resulting in potential privilege escalation.28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ceph | 12.2.11+dfsg1-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ceph | 13.2.4.125+gad802694f5-lp150.2.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ceph-test | 13.2.4.125+gad802694f5-lp150.2.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-base | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-common | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-debuginfo | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-mgr | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-mon | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-selinux | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:ceph-test | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libcephfs-devel | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:libcephfs2 | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:librados-devel | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:librados2 | 2:12.2.12-45.el7cp · Red Hat:ceph_storage:3::el7 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:ceph | 12.2.10+git.1549630712.bb089269ea-2.27.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-285 · Improper AuthorizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLsCAPEC-1likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Directory IndexingCAPEC-127likelihood: High · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Malicious FilesCAPEC-17likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Opaque Client-based Data TokensCAPEC-39likelihood: High · Medium
- Bypassing ATA Password SecurityCAPEC-402
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
- Data from Local SystemT1005
- Query RegistryT1012
- File and Directory DiscoveryT1083
- Access Token Manipulation:Token Impersonation/TheftT1134.001
- Use Alternate Authentication Material:Web Session CookieT1550.004
- Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in RegistryT1552.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data ManipulationT1565.002
- Hijack Execution Flow: Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessT1574.005
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
- Hijack Execution Flow: ServicesFile Permissions WeaknessT1574.010
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (7 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2538
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2541
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14662
- ceph.com/releases/13-2-4-mimic-released
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00002.html
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/08/msg00013.html
- usn.ubuntu.com/4035-1/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.