qmp_guest_file_read in qga/commands-posix.c and qga/commands-win32.c in qemu-ga (aka QEMU Guest Agent) in QEMU 2.12.50 has an integer overfl
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 38/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 25% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.8% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: qemu (Debian:12) 1:3.1+dfsg-1; qemu (Debian:8) 1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u10; qemu (Debian:9) 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u6.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to qemu (Debian:12) 1:3.1+dfsg-1; qemu (Debian:8) 1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u10; qemu (Debian:9) 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
qmp_guest_file_read in qga/commands-posix.c and qga/commands-win32.c in qemu-ga (aka QEMU Guest Agent) in QEMU 2.12.50 has an integer overflow causing a g_malloc0() call to trigger a segmentation fault when trying to allocate a large memory chunk. The vulnerability can be exploited by sending a crafted QMP command (including guest-file-read with a large count value) to the agent via the listening socket.
- Published
- Jun 21, 2018
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 25.1% · 98th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-190
Report tools
Action score
38
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 8 / 30 · 25.1%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| qemu | qemu | cpe:2.3:a:qemu:qemu |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical ubuntu linux14.04
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.10
- debian debian linux8.0
- debian debian linux9.0
- qemu qemuup to 2.12.50 inclusive
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | qemu | before 1:3.1+dfsg-1 | 1:3.1+dfsg-1 |
| Debian:8 | qemu | before 1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u10 | 1:2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u10 |
| Debian:9 | qemu | before 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u6 | 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u6 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 | qemu | before 2.9.1-6.19.11 | 2.9.1-6.19.11 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 | qemu | before 2.11.2-9.9.1 | 2.11.2-9.9.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3 | kvm | before 1.4.2-53.23.2 | 1.4.2-53.23.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3 | xen | before 4.2.5_21-45.25.1 | 4.2.5_21-45.25.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 | kvm | before 1.4.2-60.15.2 | 1.4.2-60.15.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12-LTSS | qemu | before 2.0.2-48.43.3 | 2.0.2-48.43.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12-LTSS | xen | before 4.4.4_34-22.71.2 | 4.4.4_34-22.71.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP1 | qemu | before 2.3.1-33.12.1 | 2.3.1-33.12.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP1 | xen | before 4.5.5_24-22.52.3 | 4.5.5_24-22.52.3 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | xen | before 4.4.4_34-61.32.1 | 4.4.4_34-61.32.1 |
| SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 7 | qemu | before 2.6.2-41.43.3 | 2.6.2-41.43.3 |
Same product
qemu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-12928The QMP migrate command in QEMU version 4.0.0 and earlier is vulnerable to OS command injection, which allows the remote attacker to achieve46Plan
- CVE-2015-8556Local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Gentoo QEMU package before 2.5.0-r1.44Plan
- CVE-2017-15118A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found in NBD server implementation in qemu before 2.11 allowing a client to request an expor43Plan
- CVE-2022-36648The hardware emulation in the of_dpa_cmd_add_l2_flood of rocker device model in QEMU, as used in 7.0.0 and earlier, allows remote attackers 41Plan
- CVE-2017-16845hw/input/ps2.c in Qemu does not validate 'rptr' and 'count' values during guest migration, leading to out-of-bounds access.41Plan
- CVE-2016-7161Heap-based buffer overflow in the .receive callback of xlnx.xps-ethernetlite in QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) allows attackers to execute arbitr41Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:qemu | 1:3.1+dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:kvm | 1.4.2-53.23.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:qemu | 2.0.2-48.43.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:xen | 4.4.4_34-61.32.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | dos | 2018-06-22 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoCsame day
- TodayOct 13, 2026+3036 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or WraparoundCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.