Cisco IOS XR 4.3.4 and earlier on ASR 9000 devices, when bridge-group virtual interface (BVI) routing is enabled, allows remote attackers to
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.64% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50.1% of all records.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Cisco IOS XR 4.3.4 and earlier on ASR 9000 devices, when bridge-group virtual interface (BVI) routing is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (chip and card hangs) via a series of crafted MPLS packets, aka Bug ID CSCuo91149.
- Published
- Jul 17, 2014
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cisco | ios xr | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:ios_xr |
| cisco | asr 9000 rsp440 router | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asr_9000_rsp440_router |
| cisco | asr 9001 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asr_9001 |
| cisco | asr 9006 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asr_9006 |
| cisco | asr 9010 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asr_9010 |
| cisco | asr 9904 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asr_9904 |
| cisco | asr 9912 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asr_9912 |
| cisco | asr 9922 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:asr_9922 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco asr 9000 rsp440 routerall versions
- cisco asr 9001all versions
- cisco asr 9006all versions
- cisco asr 9010all versions
- cisco asr 9904all versions
- cisco asr 9912all versions
- cisco asr 9922all versions
- cisco ios xrup to 4.3.4 inclusive
- cisco ios xr4.3.0
- cisco ios xr4.3.1
- cisco ios xr4.3.2
Same product
cisco: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-3118Cisco IOS XR Software Cisco Discovery Protocol Format String VulnerabilityKEV69This week
- CVE-2020-3569Cisco IOS XR Software DVMRP Memory Exhaustion VulnerabilitiesKEV65This week
- CVE-2020-3566Cisco IOS XR Software DVMRP Memory Exhaustion VulnerabilityKEV65This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2014-2176Jun 14, 2014 · Cisco IOS XR 4.1.2 through 5.1.1 on ASR 9000 devices, when a Trident-based line card is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of s29Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2014-3308Jul 7, 2014 · Cisco IOS XR on Trident line cards in ASR 9000 devices lacks a static punt policer, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of servi26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2014-3322Jul 24, 2014 · Cisco IOS XR 4.3(.2) and earlier on ASR 9000 devices does not properly perform NetFlow sampling of IP packets, which allows remote attackers24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- C · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- C
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.