The prep_reprocess_req function in do_tgs_req.c in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.10.5 does not pro
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.9% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86.8% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: krb5 (Debian:12) 1.10.1+dfsg-5; krb5 (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2; krb5-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to krb5 (Debian:12) 1.10.1+dfsg-5; krb5 (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2; krb5-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client) 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The prep_reprocess_req function in do_tgs_req.c in the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.10.5 does not properly perform service-principal realm referral, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a crafted TGS-REQ request.
- Published
- Apr 19, 2013
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.9% · 86th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-476
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 16 / 40 · 4.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.9%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| mit | kerberos 5 | cpe:2.3:a:mit:kerberos_5 |
| opensuse | opensuse | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:opensuse |
| fedoraproject | fedora | cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
| redhat | enterprise linux eus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_eus |
| redhat | enterprise linux server | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server |
| redhat | enterprise linux server aus | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server_aus |
| redhat | enterprise linux workstation | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fedoraproject fedora17
- fedoraproject fedora18
- mit kerberos 5before 1.10.5
- opensuse opensuse11.4
- opensuse opensuse12.1
- opensuse opensuse12.2
- opensuse opensuse12.3
- redhat enterprise linux desktop6.0
- redhat enterprise linux eus6.4
- redhat enterprise linux server6.0
- redhat enterprise linux server aus6.4
- redhat enterprise linux workstation6.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | krb5 | before 1.10.1+dfsg-5 | 1.10.1+dfsg-5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5 | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-debuginfo | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-devel | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-libs | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-pkinit-openssl | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-server | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-server-ldap | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | krb5-workstation | before 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 |
Same product
mit: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2007-0956The telnet daemon (telnetd) in MIT krb5 before 1.6.1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain system access via a username 49Plan
- CVE-2011-0285The process_chpw_request function in schpw.c in the password-changing functionality in kadmind in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.7 through 1.9 46Plan
- CVE-2001-0247Buffer overflows in BSD-based FTP servers allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long pattern string containing a {} se46Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2012-1016Mar 5, 2013 · The pkinit_server_return_padata function in plugins/preauth/pkinit/pkinit_srv.c in the PKINIT implementation in the Key Distribution Center 21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2013-1415Mar 5, 2013 · The pkinit_check_kdc_pkid function in plugins/preauth/pkinit/pkinit_crypto_openssl.c in the PKINIT implementation in the Key Distribution Ce21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2002-2443May 29, 2013 · schpw.c in the kpasswd service in kadmind in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.11.3 does not properly validate UDP packets before sending r22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:krb5 | 1.10.1+dfsg-5 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5 | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-debuginfo | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-devel | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-libs | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-pkinit-openssl | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-server | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-server-ldap | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:krb5-workstation | 0:1.10.3-10.el6_4.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::client | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-476 · NULL Pointer DereferenceCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (9 more)Show less
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/102058.html
- lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/102074.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-05/msg00011.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00041.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00102.html
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0748.html
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:157
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:158
- github.com/krb5/krb5/commit/8ee70ec63931d1e38567905387ab9b1d45734d81
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.