Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities on the IBM BladeCenter with Advanced Management Module (AMM) firmware build ID BPET48L,
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 82.7% of all records.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities on the IBM BladeCenter with Advanced Management Module (AMM) firmware build ID BPET48L, and possibly other versions before 4.7 and 5.0, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) INDEX or (2) IPADDR parameter to private/cindefn.php, (3) the domain parameter to private/power_management_policy_options.php, the slot parameter to (4) private/pm_temp.php or (5) private/power_module.php, (6) the WEBINDEX parameter to private/blade_leds.php, or (7) the SLOT parameter to private/ipmi_bladestatus.php.
- Published
- Jul 8, 2010
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.3% · 83th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-79
Report tools
Action score
18
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ibm | advanced management module | cpe:2.3:h:ibm:advanced_management_module |
| ibm | bladecenter | cpe:2.3:h:ibm:bladecenter |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ibm advanced management moduleup to 2.48 inclusive
- ibm advanced management moduleup to 3.54 inclusive
- ibm advanced management module1.00
- ibm advanced management module1.01
- ibm advanced management module1.20
- ibm advanced management module1.25
- ibm advanced management module1.26
- ibm advanced management module1.28
- ibm advanced management module1.32
- ibm advanced management module1.34
- ibm advanced management module1.36
- ibm advanced management module1.42
- ibm advanced management module2.46
- ibm advanced management module2.48
- ibm advanced management module2.50
- ibm advanced management module3.54
Same product
ibm: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2009-1290Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web administration interface in the Advanced Management Module (AMM) on th27Monitor
- CVE-2010-2656The IBM BladeCenter with Advanced Management Module (AMM) firmware build ID BPET48L, and possibly other versions before 4.7 and 5.0, stores 21Monitor
- CVE-2010-1460The IBM BladeCenter with Advanced Management Module (AMM) firmware before bpet50g does not properly perform interrupt sharing for USB and iS21Monitor
- CVE-2009-1288Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Advanced Management Module (AMM) on the IBM BladeCenter, including the BladeCente18Monitor
- CVE-2010-2655Directory traversal vulnerability in private/file_management.php on the IBM BladeCenter with Advanced Management Module (AMM) firmware build17Monitor
- CVE-2009-1289private/login.ssi in the Advanced Management Module (AMM) on the IBM BladeCenter, including the BladeCenter H with BPET36H 54, allows remote16Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | webapps | 2010-07-06 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-2 d
- Published
- TodayOct 14, 2026+5943 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- P · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- P
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-79 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;Fixed
commentEl.textContent = comment.body;Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.