CVE-2009-0940· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the HP Embedded Web Server (EWS) on HP LaserJet Printers, Edgeline Printers, a

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 64.2% of all records.
Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the HP Embedded Web Server (EWS) on HP LaserJet Printers, Edgeline Printers, and Digital Senders allow remote attackers to hijack the intranet connectivity of arbitrary users for requests that (1) print documents via unknown vectors, (2) modify the network configuration via a NetIPChange request to hp/device/config_result_YesNo.html/config, or (3) change the password via the Password and ConfirmPassword parameters to hp/device/set_config_password.html/config.

MediumCVSS 5.1 · v2.0—No exploit No fix recorded

Published: Mar 18, 2009
Updated: Jun 16, 2026
EPSS: 1.1% · 64th percentile
CWE: CWE-352

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 20 / 40 · 5.1 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 1.1%

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
hp	8100c digital sender	cpe:2.3:h:hp:8100c_digital_sender
hp	9100c digital sender	cpe:2.3:h:hp:9100c_digital_sender
hp	9200c digital sender	cpe:2.3:h:hp:9200c_digital_sender
hp	9250c digital sender	cpe:2.3:h:hp:9250c_digital_sender
hp	color laserjet	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet
hp	color laserjet 1500	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_1500
hp	color laserjet 2500	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_2500
hp	color laserjet 2500l	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_2500l
hp	color laserjet 2500lse	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_2500lse
hp	color laserjet 2500n	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_2500n
hp	color laserjet 2500tn	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_2500tn
hp	color laserjet 2605dtn	cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_2605dtn

and 142 more

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

hp 8100c digital senderall versions
hp 9100c digital senderall versions
hp 9200c digital senderall versions
hp 9250c digital senderall versions
hp color laserjetall versions
hp color laserjet 1500all versions
hp color laserjet 2500all versions
hp color laserjet 2500lall versions
hp color laserjet 2500lseall versions
hp color laserjet 2500nall versions
hp color laserjet 2500tnall versions
hp color laserjet 2605dtnall versions
hp color laserjet 4370mfp20081211_46.211.2
hp color laserjet 4600all versions
hp color laserjet 4600dnall versions
hp color laserjet 4600dtnall versions
hp color laserjet 4600hdnall versions
hp color laserjet 4650all versions
hp color laserjet 4700all versions
hp color laserjet 4730 mfpall versions

Same product

hp: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2009-0941The HP Embedded Web Server (EWS) on HP LaserJet Printers, Edgeline Printers, and Digital Senders has no management password by default, whic
31Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality: P · data can be read
Integrity: P · data or configuration can be modified
Availability: P · the service can be disrupted

Attack complexity: High
Confidentiality impact: P
Integrity impact: P
Availability impact: P

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

nvd-primary

Root cause

State-changing requests rely on the session cookie the browser sends automatically; nothing verifies that the request came from the user’s own page.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-352 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

1app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true } }));2app.post("/account/address", updateAddress);

Fixed

1app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true, sameSite: "lax" } }));2app.post("/account/address", csrfProtection, updateAddress);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01684566

Show all references (6 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records