Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in (1) University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2002 through 2007c, (2) University of Washington Alpine 2
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Plan (action score 42/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 6.3% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 93.5% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: uw-imap (Debian:12) 7:2007d~dfsg-1; uw-imap (Debian:4.0) 7:2002edebian1-13.1+etch1; uw-imap (Debian:5.0) 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny1, 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny3.
Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to uw-imap (Debian:12) 7:2007d~dfsg-1; uw-imap (Debian:4.0) 7:2002edebian1-13.1+etch1; uw-imap (Debian:5.0) 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny1, 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in (1) University of Washington IMAP Toolkit 2002 through 2007c, (2) University of Washington Alpine 2.00 and earlier, and (3) Panda IMAP allow (a) local users to gain privileges by specifying a long folder extension argument on the command line to the tmail or dmail program; and (b) remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending e-mail to a destination mailbox name composed of a username and '+' character followed by a long string, processed by the tmail or possibly dmail program.
- Published
- Nov 10, 2008
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 6.3% · 93th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
42
Plan
Add it to your regular patch cycle.
- CVSS
- 40 / 40 · 10.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 6.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| university of washington | alpine | cpe:2.3:a:university_of_washington:alpine |
| university of washington | imap toolkit | cpe:2.3:a:university_of_washington:imap_toolkit |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- university of washington alpine0.80
- university of washington alpine0.81
- university of washington alpine0.82
- university of washington alpine0.83
- university of washington alpine0.98
- university of washington alpine0.99
- university of washington alpine0.999
- university of washington alpine0.9999
- university of washington alpine0.99999
- university of washington alpine0.999999
- university of washington alpine1.00
- university of washington alpine1.10
- university of washington alpine2.00
- university of washington imap toolkit2002
- university of washington imap toolkit2003
- university of washington imap toolkit2004
- university of washington imap toolkit2005
- university of washington imap toolkit2006
- university of washington imap toolkit2007
- university of washington imap toolkit2007c
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | uw-imap | before 7:2007d~dfsg-1 | 7:2007d~dfsg-1 |
| Debian:4.0 | uw-imap | before 7:2002edebian1-13.1+etch1 | 7:2002edebian1-13.1+etch1 |
| Debian:5.0 | uw-imap | before 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny1 | 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny1 |
| Debian:5.0 | uw-imap | before 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny3 | 2007b~dfsg-4+lenny3 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | imap | before 1:2002d-15 | 1:2002d-15 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | imap-debuginfo | before 1:2002d-15 | 1:2002d-15 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | imap-devel | before 1:2002d-15 | 1:2002d-15 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | imap-utils | before 1:2002d-15 | 1:2002d-15 |
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:uw-imap | 7:2007d~dfsg-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:imap | 1:2002d-15 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:imap-debuginfo | 1:2002d-15 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:imap-devel | 1:2002d-15 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:imap-utils | 1:2002d-15 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- C · data can be read
- Integrity
- C · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- C · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- C
- Integrity impact
- C
- Availability impact
- C
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (19 more)Show less
- mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-uw/2008-October/002268.html
- marc.info/?l=full-disclosure&m=122572590212610&w=4
- panda.com/imap/
- rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0275.html
- secunia.com/advisories/32483
- secunia.com/advisories/32512
- secunia.com/advisories/33142
- secunia.com/advisories/33996
- securityreason.com/securityalert/4570
- securitytracker.com/id?1021131
- support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2009-065.htm
- www.bitsec.com/en/rad/bsa-081103.c
- www.bitsec.com/en/rad/bsa-081103.txt
- www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1685
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:146
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/3
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/4
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/11/03/5
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/498002/100/0/threaded
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.