Unknown vulnerability in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 kernel 4GB/4GB split patch, when running on x86 with the hugemem kernel, allows loca
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 8/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.39% (FIRST EPSS).
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: kernel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL; kernel-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL; kernel-devel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to kernel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL; kernel-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL; kernel-devel (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as) 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Unknown vulnerability in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 kernel 4GB/4GB split patch, when running on x86 with the hugemem kernel, allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash).
- Published
- Feb 19, 2005
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 32th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
8
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
| redhat | enterprise linux desktop | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat enterprise linux4.0
- redhat enterprise linux desktop4.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-debuginfo | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-devel | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-doc | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-hugemem | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-hugemem-devel | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-smp | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | kernel-smp-devel | before 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2015-3246libuser before 0.56.13-8 and 0.60 before 0.60-7, as used in the userhelper program in the usermode package, directly modifies /etc/passwd, wKEV62This week
- CVE-2023-50387Certain DNSSEC aspects of the DNS protocol (in RFC 4033, 4034, 4035, 6840, and related RFCs) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of ser60This week
- CVE-2017-5456A mechanism to bypass file system access protections in the sandbox using the file system request constructor through an IPC message.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2004-0750Oct 20, 2004 · Unknown vulnerability in redhat-config-nfs before 1.0.13, when shares are exported to multiple hosts, can produce incorrect permissions and 30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2004-0491Dec 31, 2004 · The linux-2.4.21-mlock.patch in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 does not properly maintain the mlock page count when one process unlocks pages th8Monitor
- Later →CVE-2005-0384Mar 15, 2005 · Unknown vulnerability in the PPP driver for the Linux kernel 2.6.8.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (kernel crash) via21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:kernel | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-debuginfo | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-devel | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-doc | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-hugemem | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-hugemem-devel | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-smp | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:kernel-smp-devel | 0:2.6.9-5.0.3.EL · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::as | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- P · the service can be disrupted
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- P
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.