n8n before 1.123.73 Remote Code Execution via Git Node
n8n versions before 1.123.73, 2.35.4, and 2.36.2 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the Git node. The node reset a fixed list of command-bearing configuration keys before each operation, but that list did not cover the content-filter and merge-driver key families. A repository with local configuration setting one of those keys together with a matching attribute pattern causes git to execute the configured command during an ordinary Add, Commit, Checkout, or Pull operation. The command runs as the n8n process user.
- Published
- Sep 3, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 56th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 7.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| n8n | n8n | cpe:2.3:a:n8n:n8n |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- n8n n8nbefore 1.123.73
- n8n n8n2.0.0 and later · before 2.35.4
- n8n n8n2.36.0 and later · before 2.36.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
n8n-io n8n
- 1.123.73, 2.36.2, 2.35.4not affected
- before 1.123.73affected · semver
- before 2.36.2affected · semver
- before 2.35.4affected · semver
Same product
n8n: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-68613n8n Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Expression InjectionKEV95Now
- CVE-2026-21858n8n Vulnerable to Unauthenticated File Access via Improper Webhook Request Handling64This week
- CVE-2026-1470Authenticated users can bypass the Expression sandbox mechanism to achieve full remote code execution on n8n’s main node.45Plan
- CVE-2025-68668n8n Vulnerable to Arbitrary Command Execution in Pyodide based Python Code Node43Plan
- CVE-2026-0863Sandbox escape in n8n Python task runner allows for arbitrary code execution on the underlying host.42Plan
- CVE-2026-21877n8n is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Arbitrary File Write41Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| n8n-io n8n | 1.123.73 | Vendor (CNA) |
| n8n-io n8n | 2.35.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| n8n-io n8n | 2.36.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- vonypetoreporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-25053211 days apartn8n is Vulnerable to OS Command Injection in Git Node37Monitor
- CVE-2026-7708014 days apartn8n before 1.123.69 Arbitrary File Read and Write via Snowflake34Monitor
- CVE-2026-7276723 days apartn8n before 1.123.67 Remote Code Execution via Git node34Monitor
- CVE-2026-7708414 days apartn8n before 1.123.69 Remote Code Execution via Git Node Configuration Values30Monitor
- CVE-2026-6559043 days apartn8n before 2.30.1 Shell Sandbox Bypass on Linux Windows22Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- github.com/n8n-io/n8n/security/advisories/GHSA-mwp5-2m32-r54h
- www.vulncheck.com/advisories/n8n-before-1.123.73-remote-code-execution-via-git-node
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.