Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2025-32096· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

Pexip Infinity 33.0 through 37.0 before 37.1 has improper input validation in signaling that allows an attacker to trigger a software abort,

Pexip Infinity 33.0 through 37.0 before 37.1 has improper input validation in signaling that allows an attacker to trigger a software abort, resulting in a denial of service.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Dec 25, 2025
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.3% · 22th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · mitre
7.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
pexippexip infinity

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • pexip pexip infinity33.0 and later · before 37.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (mitre). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Pexip Infinity

    • 33.0 and later · before 37.1affected

Same product

pexip: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2017-6551Pexip Infinity before 14.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service restart) or execute arbitrary code via vectors rela
    40Plan
  • CVE-2020-11805Pexip Reverse Proxy and TURN Server before 6.1.0 has Incorrect UDP Access Control via TURN.
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2015-4719The client API authentication mechanism in Pexip Infinity before 10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a crafted request.
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2025-59683Pexip Infinity 15.0 through 38.0 before 38.1 has Improper Access Control in the Secure Scheduler for Exchange service, when used with Office
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2022-27933Pexip Infinity before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort via One Touch Join.
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2022-26656Pexip Infinity before 27.3 allows remote attackers to trigger a software abort, and possibly enumerate usernames, via One Touch Join.
    32Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2025-320950 days apartPexip Infinity before 37.0 has improper input validation in signalling that allows a remote attacker to trigger a software abort via a craft
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-487040 days apartPexip Infinity 35.0 through 37.2 before 38.0 has Improper Input Validation in signalling that allows an attacker to trigger a software abort
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-663790 days apartPexip Infinity before 39.0 has Improper Input Validation in the media implementation, allowing a remote attacker to trigger a software abort
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-490880 days apartPexip Infinity 32.0 through 37.1 before 37.2, in certain configurations of OTJ (One Touch Join) for Teams SIP Guest Join, has Improper Input
    23Monitor
  • CVE-2025-664430 days apartPexip Infinity 35.0 through 38.1 before 39.0, in non-default configurations that use Direct Media for WebRTC, has Improper Input Validation
    21Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-617 · Reachable Assertion

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records