Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setDiagnosisCfg os command injection
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.2% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. This vulnerability affects the function setDiagnosisCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation of the argument ip results in os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.
- Published
- May 24, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 23, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.3% · 88th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-77
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulDB
- 9.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP LensIs your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Totolink A8000RU
- 7.1cu.643_b20200521affected
Same product
totolink: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-9478Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setParentalRules os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-9477Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setAccessDeviceCfg os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-9476Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setPasswordCfg os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-9475Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setIpQosRules os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-9458Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setWanCfg os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-9457Totolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi UploadFirmwareFile os command injection36Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- LtzHuster (VulDB User)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-93850 days apartTotolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setTracerouteCfg os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-93860 days apartTotolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setLanguageCfg os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-94050 days apartTotolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setGameSpeedCfg os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-94060 days apartTotolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setRemoteCfg os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-94070 days apartTotolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setFirewallType os command injection36Monitor
- CVE-2026-94080 days apartTotolink A8000RU Web Management cstecgi.cgi setStaticDhcpRules os command injection36Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- LDAP InjectionCAPEC-136likelihood: High · High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- IMAP/SMTP Command InjectionCAPEC-183Medium
- Command InjectionCAPEC-248likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Terminal DevicesCAPEC-40likelihood: High · Very High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Configuration FilesCAPEC-75likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- github.com/Litengzheng/vuldb_new2/blob/main/A8000RU/vul_331/README.md
- vuldb.com/submit/813429
- vuldb.com/vuln/365347
- vuldb.com/vuln/365347/cti
- www.totolink.net/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.