OnCell G3470A-LTE Series: Authenticated Format String Errors
OnCell G3470A-LTE Series firmware versions v1.7.7 and prior have been identified as vulnerable due to accepting a format string from an external source as an argument. An attacker could modify an externally controlled format string to cause a memory leak and denial of service.
- Published
- Jun 25, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 26th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-134
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
39
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.8
- CNA · Moxa
- 6.3
- 3.5 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-us-t firmware | cpe:2.3:o:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-us-t_firmware |
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-us-t | cpe:2.3:h:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-us-t |
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-eu firmware | cpe:2.3:o:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-eu_firmware |
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-eu | cpe:2.3:h:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-eu |
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-eu-t firmware | cpe:2.3:o:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-eu-t_firmware |
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-eu-t | cpe:2.3:h:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-eu-t |
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-us firmware | cpe:2.3:o:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-us_firmware |
| moxa | oncell g3470a-lte-us | cpe:2.3:h:moxa:oncell_g3470a-lte-us |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- moxa oncell g3470a-lte-eu firmwareup to 1.7.7 inclusive
- moxa oncell g3470a-lte-eu-t firmwareup to 1.7.7 inclusive
- moxa oncell g3470a-lte-us firmwareup to 1.7.7 inclusive
- moxa oncell g3470a-lte-us-t firmwareup to 1.7.7 inclusive
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Moxa). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Moxa OnCell G3150A-LTE Series
- 1.0 and later · up to and including 1.7.7affected
Same product
moxa: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-4639OnCell G3470A-LTE Series: Authenticated Command Injection via webDelIPSec35Monitor
- CVE-2024-4640OnCell G3470A-LTE Series: Authenticated Command Injection via sendTestEmail32Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Nikita AbramovPositive Technologiesfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-134 · Use of Externally-Controlled Format StringCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.