Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities exist in DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 (in the Vigor management UI) because of improper retrieval
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.32% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities exist in DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 (in the Vigor management UI) because of improper retrieval and handling of the CGI form parameters.
- Published
- Oct 3, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 24th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| draytek | vigor2620 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigor2620_firmware |
| draytek | vigor2620 | cpe:2.3:h:draytek:vigor2620 |
| draytek | vigor2915 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigor2915_firmware |
| draytek | vigor2915 | cpe:2.3:h:draytek:vigor2915 |
| draytek | vigor2866 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigor2866_firmware |
| draytek | vigor2866 | cpe:2.3:h:draytek:vigor2866 |
| draytek | vigor2766 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigor2766_firmware |
| draytek | vigor2766 | cpe:2.3:h:draytek:vigor2766 |
| draytek | vigor2865 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigor2865_firmware |
| draytek | vigor2865 | cpe:2.3:h:draytek:vigor2865 |
| draytek | vigor2765 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigor2765_firmware |
| draytek | vigor2765 | cpe:2.3:h:draytek:vigor2765 |
and 36 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- draytek vigor1000b firmwarebefore 4.3.2.8
- draytek vigor1000b firmware4.4.0.0 and later · before 4.4.3.1
- draytek vigor165 firmwarebefore 4.2.7
- draytek vigor166 firmwarebefore 4.2.7
- draytek vigor2133 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2135 firmwarebefore 4.4.5.3
- draytek vigor2620 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2762 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2763 firmwarebefore 4.4.5.3
- draytek vigor2765 firmwarebefore 4.4.5.3
- draytek vigor2766 firmwarebefore 4.4.5.3
- draytek vigor2832 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2860 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2862 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2865 firmwarebefore 4.4.5.2
- draytek vigor2866 firmwarebefore 4.4.5.2
- draytek vigor2915 firmwarebefore 4.4.5.3
- draytek vigor2925 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2926 firmwareall versions
- draytek vigor2952 firmwareall versions
Same product
draytek: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-51139Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Vigor2620/LTE200 3.9.8.9 and earlier and Vigor2860/2925 3.9.8 and earlier and Vigor2862/2926 3.9.9.5 and ea39Monitor
- CVE-2023-31447user_login.cgi on Draytek Vigor2620 devices before 3.9.8.4 (and on all versions of Vigor2925 devices) allows attackers to send a crafted pay39Monitor
- CVE-2024-41588The CGI endpoints v2x00.cgi and cgiwcg.cgi of DrayTek Vigor3910 devices through 4.3.2.6 are vulnerable to buffer overflows, by authenticated32Monitor
- CVE-2024-41594An issue in DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 allows an attacker to obtain sensitive information because the httpd server of the Vigo30Monitor
- CVE-2024-41591DrayTek Vigor3910 devices through 4.3.2.6 allow unauthenticated DOM-based reflected XSS.24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-51139147 days apartBuffer Overflow vulnerability in Vigor2620/LTE200 3.9.8.9 and earlier and Vigor2860/2925 3.9.8 and earlier and Vigor2862/2926 3.9.9.5 and ea39Monitor
- CVE-2024-415880 days apartThe CGI endpoints v2x00.cgi and cgiwcg.cgi of DrayTek Vigor3910 devices through 4.3.2.6 are vulnerable to buffer overflows, by authenticated32Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-1601 · Oct 4, 2024(DrayTek Çoklu Ürün Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) { return -EINVAL;}memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.