OpenSC before 0.20.0 has a double free in coolkey_free_private_data because coolkey_add_object in libopensc/card-coolkey.c lacks a uniquenes
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 27/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.65% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50% of all records.
- Physical access to the device is required. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: opensc (Debian:12) 0.20.0-1; opensc (openSUSE:Leap 15.2) 0.19.0-lp152.3.3.1; opensc (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.22.0-3.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to opensc (Debian:12) 0.20.0-1; opensc (openSUSE:Leap 15.2) 0.19.0-lp152.3.3.1; opensc (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.22.0-3.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
OpenSC before 0.20.0 has a double free in coolkey_free_private_data because coolkey_add_object in libopensc/card-coolkey.c lacks a uniqueness check.
- Published
- Apr 29, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-415
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| opensc project | opensc | cpe:2.3:a:opensc_project:opensc |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- opensc project openscbefore 0.20.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | opensc | before 0.20.0-1 | 0.20.0-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | opensc | before 0.19.0-lp152.3.3.1 | 0.19.0-lp152.3.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | opensc | before 0.22.0-3.1 | 0.22.0-3.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | opensc | before 0:0.20.0-2.el8 | 0:0.20.0-2.el8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | opensc-debuginfo | before 0:0.20.0-2.el8 | 0:0.20.0-2.el8 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | opensc-debugsource | before 0:0.20.0-2.el8 | 0:0.20.0-2.el8 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15-ESPOS | opensc | before 0.18.0-150000.3.23.1 | 0.18.0-150000.3.23.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP2 | opensc | before 0.19.0-3.7.1 | 0.19.0-3.7.1 |
Same product
opensc project: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-6502sc_context_create in ctx.c in libopensc in OpenSC 0.19.0 has a memory leak, as demonstrated by a call from eidenv.31Monitor
- CVE-2021-34193Stack overflow vulnerability in OpenSC smart card middleware before 0.23 via crafted responses to APDUs.30Monitor
- CVE-2019-16058An issue was discovered in the pam_p11 component 0.2.0 and 0.3.0 for OpenSC.30Monitor
- CVE-2023-2977A vulnerbility was found in OpenSC.28Monitor
- CVE-2025-66215OpenSC: Stack-buffer-overflow WRITE in card-oberthur27Monitor
- CVE-2025-66038OpenSC: `sc_compacttlv_find_tag` can return out-of-bounds pointers27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:opensc | 0.20.0-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:opensc | 0.19.0-lp152.3.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:opensc | 0:0.20.0-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:opensc-debuginfo | 0:0.20.0-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:opensc-debugsource | 0:0.20.0-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseos | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:opensc | 0.19.0-3.7.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Physical access to the device is required.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Physical
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-415 · Double FreeCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.