Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF. This affects WAC120 before 2.1.7, WAC505 before 5.0.5.4, WAC510 before 5.0.5.4, WNAP320 before 3.7.11.4, WNAP210v2 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP350 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP360 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP660 before 3.7.11.4, WNDAP620 before 2.1.7, WND930 before 2.1.5, and WN604 before 3.3.10.
- Published
- Apr 27, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 21th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-352
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 29 / 40 · 7.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.4
- CNA · mitre
- 5.2
- 2.2 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AC:L/AV:A/A:H/C:N/I:N/PR:L/S:U/UI:R
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netgear | wac120 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:wac120_firmware |
| netgear | wac120 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:wac120 |
| netgear | wac505 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:wac505_firmware |
| netgear | wac505 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:wac505 |
| netgear | wac510 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:wac510_firmware |
| netgear | wac510 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:wac510 |
| netgear | wnap320 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:wnap320_firmware |
| netgear | wnap320 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:wnap320 |
| netgear | wnap210 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:wnap210_firmware |
| netgear | wnap210 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:wnap210 |
| netgear | wndap350 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:wndap350_firmware |
| netgear | wndap350 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:wndap350 |
and 10 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netgear wac120 firmwarebefore 2.1.7
- netgear wac505 firmwarebefore 5.0.5.4
- netgear wac510 firmwarebefore 5.0.5.4
- netgear wn604 firmwarebefore 3.3.10
- netgear wnap210 firmwarebefore 3.7.11.4
- netgear wnap320 firmwarebefore 3.7.11.4
- netgear wnd930 firmwarebefore 2.1.5
- netgear wndap350 firmwarebefore 3.7.11.4
- netgear wndap360 firmwarebefore 3.7.11.4
- netgear wndap620 firmwarebefore 2.1.7
- netgear wndap660 firmwarebefore 3.7.11.4
Same product
netgear: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-21120Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by CSRF.32Monitor
- CVE-2018-21094Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by incorrect configuration of security settings.29Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-352 · Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
State-changing requests rely on the session cookie the browser sends automatically; nothing verifies that the request came from the user’s own page.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-352 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true } }));app.post("/account/address", updateAddress);Fixed
app.use(session({ cookie: { httpOnly: true, sameSite: "lax" } }));app.post("/account/address", csrfProtection, updateAddress);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.