A vulnerability in Hitachi Command Suite prior to 8.7.1-00 and Hitachi Automation Director prior to 8.5.0-00 allow authenticated remote user
A vulnerability in Hitachi Command Suite prior to 8.7.1-00 and Hitachi Automation Director prior to 8.5.0-00 allow authenticated remote users to expose technical information through error messages. Hitachi Command Suite includes Hitachi Device Manager and Hitachi Compute Systems Manager.
- Published
- Feb 14, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.9% · 58th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-209
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.9%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 4.3
- CNA · mitre
- 4.3
- agree
CVSS:3.0/AC:L/AV:N/A:N/C:L/I:N/PR:L/S:U/UI:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| hitachi | device manager | cpe:2.3:a:hitachi:device_manager |
| hitachi | compute systems manager | cpe:2.3:a:hitachi:compute_systems_manager |
| hitachi | automation director | cpe:2.3:a:hitachi:automation_director |
| linux | linux kernel | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel |
| microsoft | windows | cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows |
| oracle | solaris | cpe:2.3:o:oracle:solaris |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- hitachi automation director8.1.1-00 and later · before 8.5.0-00
- hitachi automation director8.2.0-00 and later · before 8.5.0-00
- hitachi compute systems managerbefore 8.7.1-00
- hitachi device manager7.0.0-00 and later · before 8.7.1-00
Same product
hitachi: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-9294RMI vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager before 8.5.2-01 allows remote attackers to execute internal commands without authentication via 40Plan
- CVE-2023-34143Improper Validation of Certificate Vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager32Monitor
- CVE-2023-49107Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information Vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager30Monitor
- CVE-2023-49106Missing Password Field Masking Vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager30Monitor
- CVE-2023-34142Cleartext Transmission Vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager30Monitor
- CVE-2019-17360A vulnerability in Hitachi Command Suite 7.x and 8.x before 8.7.0-00 allows an unauthenticated remote user to trigger a denial of service (D30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-209 · Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive InformationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/soft1/global/security/
- www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/soft1/global/security/info/vuls/hitachi-sec-2019-128/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.