Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2011-1168· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the KHTMLPart::htmlError function in khtml/khtml_part.cpp in Konqueror in KDE SC 4.4.0 through 4

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the KHTMLPart::htmlError function in khtml/khtml_part.cpp in Konqueror in KDE SC 4.4.0 through 4.6.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the URI in a URL corresponding to an unavailable web site.

MediumCVSS 4.3 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Apr 18, 2011
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
2.7% · 85th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

18

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 2.7%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
kdekde sc

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • kde kde sc4.4.0
  • kde kde sc4.4.1
  • kde kde sc4.4.2
  • kde kde sc4.4.3
  • kde kde sc4.4.4
  • kde kde sc4.4.5
  • kde kde sc4.5.0
  • kde kde sc4.5.1
  • kde kde sc4.5.2
  • kde kde sc4.5.3
  • kde kde sc4.5.4
  • kde kde sc4.5.5
  • kde kde sc4.6
  • kde kde sc4.6.0
  • kde kde sc4.6.1

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:10kde4libsbefore 4:4.4.5-44:4.4.5-4
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientkdelibsbefore 6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.26:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientkdelibs-apidocsbefore 6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.26:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientkdelibs-commonbefore 6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.26:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientkdelibs-debuginfobefore 6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.26:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientkdelibs-develbefore 6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.26:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2

Same product

kde: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2010-2575Heap-based buffer overflow in the RLE decompression functionality in the TranscribePalmImageToJPEG function in generators/plucker/inplug/ima
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2010-0436Race condition in backend/ctrl.c in KDM in KDE Software Compilation (SC) 2.2.0 through 4.4.2 allows local users to change the permissions of
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2010-0923Race condition in workspace/krunner/lock/lockdlg.cc in the KRunner lock module in kdebase in KDE SC 4.4.0 allows physically proximate attack
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2011-1586Directory traversal vulnerability in the KGetMetalink::File::isValidNameAttr function in ui/metalinkcreator/metalinker.cpp in KGet in KDE SC
    24Monitor
  • CVE-2010-1000Directory traversal vulnerability in KGet in KDE SC 4.0.0 through 4.4.3 allows remote attackers to create arbitrary files via directory trav
    24Monitor
  • CVE-2011-3365The KDE SSL Wrapper (KSSL) API in KDE SC 4.6.0 through 4.7.1, and possibly earlier versions, does not use a certain font when rendering cert
    17Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:kde4libs4:4.4.5-4 · Debian:10Package registry (OSV)
red hat:kdelibs6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:kdelibs-apidocs6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:kdelibs-common6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:kdelibs-debuginfo6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:kdelibs-devel6:4.3.4-11.el6_0.2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:6::clientPackage registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

    If successful

    Confidentiality
    none
    Integrity
    P · data or configuration can be modified
    Availability
    none
    Attack complexity
    M
    Confidentiality impact
    None
    Integrity impact
    P
    Availability impact
    None

    CVSS vector

    AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

    nvd-primary

    Root cause

    User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.

    A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

    Vulnerable

    ts
    commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;

    Fixed

    ts
    commentEl.textContent = comment.body;

    Noroxi analysis

    No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

    We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

    We use this product, ask for help

    Change log

    1. Fix✗ → ✓

    For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

    References

    All records