Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.7% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 86% of all records.
- Fixed version: java-1.6.0-openjdk (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5; java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5; java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to java-1.6.0-openjdk (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5; java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5; java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo (Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client) 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, and 1.4.2_25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-0084.
- Published
- Apr 1, 2010
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.8% · 86th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
18
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.8%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- sun jdkup to 1.5.0 inclusive
- sun jdkup to 1.6.0 inclusive
- sun jdk1.5.0
- sun jdk1.6.0
- sun jreup to 1.6.0 inclusive
- sun jreup to 1.4.2_25 inclusive
- sun jreup to 1.5.0 inclusive
- sun jre1.4.2
- sun jre1.4.2_1
- sun jre1.4.2_10
- sun jre1.4.2_11
- sun jre1.4.2_12
- sun jre1.4.2_13
- sun jre1.4.2_14
- sun jre1.4.2_15
- sun jre1.4.2_16
- sun jre1.4.2_17
- sun jre1.4.2_18
- sun jre1.4.2_19
- sun jre1.4.2_2
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | java-1.6.0-openjdk | before 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 | 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | java-1.6.0-openjdk-debuginfo | before 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 | 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo | before 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 | 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel | before 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 | 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc | before 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 | 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::client | java-1.6.0-openjdk-src | before 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 | 1:1.6.0.0-1.11.b16.el5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:4 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:4 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-demo | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:4 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-devel | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:4 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-javacomm | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:4 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-src | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el4_8 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:5 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:5 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-demo | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:5 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-devel | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:5 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-javacomm | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras_sap:5 | java-1.4.2-ibm-sap-src | before 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 | 0:1.4.2.13.5.sap-1jpp.1.el5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | java-1.4.2-ibm | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | java-1.4.2-ibm-demo | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | java-1.4.2-ibm-devel | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | java-1.4.2-ibm-jdbc | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | java-1.4.2-ibm-plugin | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:3 | java-1.4.2-ibm-src | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el3 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | java-1.4.2-ibm | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el4 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el4 |
| Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | java-1.4.2-ibm-demo | before 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el4 | 0:1.4.2.13.5-1jpp.1.el4 |
+56
Same product
sun: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2010-4452Unspecified vulnerability in the Deployment component in Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 23 65This week
- CVE-2010-3563Unspecified vulnerability in the Deployment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21 allows remote attackers to affect 65This week
- CVE-2010-3552Unspecified vulnerability in the New Java Plug-in component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 21 allows remote attackers to a64This week
- CVE-2010-0886Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Deployment Toolkit component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business JDK and JRE 6 Update 10 through 161This week
- CVE-2010-0094Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18 and 5.0 Update 23 al54Plan
- CVE-2010-0842Unspecified vulnerability in the Sound component in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 18, 5.0 Update 23, 1.4.2_25, and 1.3.1_27 53Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm-accessibility | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el5 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:5::client | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm-demo | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm-devel | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm-javacomm | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm-jdbc | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm-plugin | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.5.0-ibm-src | 1:1.5.0.11.1-1jpp.3.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-sun | 1:1.6.0.19-1jpp.1.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-sun-demo | 1:1.6.0.19-1jpp.1.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-sun-devel | 1:1.6.0.19-1jpp.1.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:java-1.6.0-sun-jdbc | 1:1.6.0.19-1jpp.1.el4 · Red Hat:rhel_extras:4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- M
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=emr_na-c02273751
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00001.html
- lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00002.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-04/msg00001.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-05/msg00001.html
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-09/msg00006.html
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127557596201693&w=2
- marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134254866602253&w=2
- osvdb.org/63481
- secunia.com/advisories/39292
- secunia.com/advisories/39317
- secunia.com/advisories/39659
- secunia.com/advisories/39819
- secunia.com/advisories/40545
- secunia.com/advisories/43308
- support.apple.com/kb/HT4170
- support.apple.com/kb/HT4171
- ubuntu.com/usn/usn-923-1
- www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:084
- www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2010-175626.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.