Directory traversal vulnerability in the HP JetDirect web administration interface in the HP-ChaiSOE 1.0 embedded web server on the LaserJet
Directory traversal vulnerability in the HP JetDirect web administration interface in the HP-ChaiSOE 1.0 embedded web server on the LaserJet 9040mfp, LaserJet 9050mfp, and Color LaserJet 9500mfp before firmware 08.110.9; LaserJet 4345mfp and 9200C Digital Sender before firmware 09.120.9; Color LaserJet 4730mfp before firmware 46.200.9; LaserJet 2410, LaserJet 2420, and LaserJet 2430 before firmware 20080819 SPCL112A; LaserJet 4250 and LaserJet 4350 before firmware 20080819 SPCL015A; and LaserJet 9040 and LaserJet 9050 before firmware 20080819 SPCL110A allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via directory traversal sequences in the URI.
- Published
- Feb 4, 2009
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 7.4% · 94th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 7.4%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| hp | 9200c digital sender | cpe:2.3:h:hp:9200c_digital_sender |
| hp | color laserjet 4370mfp | cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_4370mfp |
| hp | color laserjet 9500mfp | cpe:2.3:h:hp:color_laserjet_9500mfp |
| hp | laserjet 2410 | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_2410 |
| hp | laserjet 2420 | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_2420 |
| hp | laserjet 2430 | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_2430 |
| hp | laserjet 4250 | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_4250 |
| hp | laserjet 4345mfp | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_4345mfp |
| hp | laserjet 4350 | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_4350 |
| hp | laserjet 9040 | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_9040 |
| hp | laserjet 9040mfp | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_9040mfp |
| hp | laserjet 9050 | cpe:2.3:h:hp:laserjet_9050 |
and 1 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- hp 9200c digital senderup to 20081211_09.131.1 inclusive
- hp color laserjet 4370mfpup to 20081211_46.211.2 inclusive
- hp color laserjet 9500mfpup to 20070719_05.011.2 inclusive
- hp laserjet 2410up to 20070410_08.112.3 inclusive
- hp laserjet 2420up to 20070410_08.112.3 inclusive
- hp laserjet 2430up to 20070410_08.112.3 inclusive
- hp laserjet 4250up to 20080319_08.015.0 inclusive
- hp laserjet 4345mfpup to 20081211_09.131.1 inclusive
- hp laserjet 4350up to 20080319_08.015.0 inclusive
- hp laserjet 9040up to 20080204_08.110.0 inclusive
- hp laserjet 9040mfpup to 20080204_08.110.0 inclusive
- hp laserjet 9050up to 20080204_08.110.0 inclusive
- hp laserjet 9050mfpup to 20080204_08.110.0 inclusive
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- C · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- C
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) { return res.sendStatus(400);}res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01623905
- secunia.com/advisories/33779
- www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/500657/100/0/threaded
- www.securityfocus.com/bid/33611
- www.securitytracker.com/id?1021687
- www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0341
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.