Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2008-2664· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

The rb_str_format function in Ruby 1.8.4 and earlier, 1.8.5 before 1.8.5-p231, 1.8.6 before 1.8.6-p230, 1.8.7 before 1.8.7-p22, and 1.9.0 be

The rb_str_format function in Ruby 1.8.4 and earlier, 1.8.5 before 1.8.5-p231, 1.8.6 before 1.8.6-p230, 1.8.7 before 1.8.7-p22, and 1.9.0 before 1.9.0-2 allows context-dependent attackers to trigger memory corruption via unspecified vectors related to alloca, a different issue than CVE-2008-2662, CVE-2008-2663, and CVE-2008-2725. NOTE: as of 20080624, there has been inconsistent usage of multiple CVE identifiers related to Ruby. The CVE description should be regarded as authoritative, although it is likely to change.

HighCVSS 7.8 · v2.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jun 24, 2008
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
4.3% · 91th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

32

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 4.3%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
ruby-langruby
debiandebian linux
canonicalubuntu linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux6.06
  • canonical ubuntu linux7.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux7.10
  • canonical ubuntu linux8.04
  • debian debian linux4.0
  • ruby-lang rubyup to 1.8.4 inclusive
  • ruby-lang ruby1.9.0 and later · before 1.9.0.2
  • ruby-lang ruby1.8.7 and later · before 1.8.7.22
  • ruby-lang ruby1.8.6 and later · before 1.8.6.230
  • ruby-lang rubyafter 1.8.5 · before 1.8.5.231

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:4.0ruby1.8before 1.8.5-4etch21.8.5-4etch2
Debian:4.0ruby1.9before 1.9.0+20060609-1etch21.9.0+20060609-1etch2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::asirbbefore 0:1.6.4-6.el20:1.6.4-6.el2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::asrubybefore 0:1.6.4-6.el20:1.6.4-6.el2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::asruby-develbefore 0:1.6.4-6.el20:1.6.4-6.el2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::asruby-docsbefore 0:1.6.4-6.el20:1.6.4-6.el2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::asruby-libsbefore 0:1.6.4-6.el20:1.6.4-6.el2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:2.1::asruby-tcltkbefore 0:1.6.4-6.el20:1.6.4-6.el2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asirbbefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asrubybefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asruby-debuginfobefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asruby-develbefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asruby-docsbefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asruby-libsbefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asruby-modebefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:3::asruby-tcltkbefore 0:1.6.8-12.el30:1.6.8-12.el3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asirbbefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asrubybefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asruby-debuginfobefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asruby-develbefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asruby-docsbefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asruby-libsbefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asruby-modebefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asruby-tcltkbefore 0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.10:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1

+16

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2017-17405Ruby before 2.4.3 allows Net::FTP command injection.
    57Plan
  • CVE-2008-3656Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the WEBrick::HTTPUtils.split_header_value function in WEBrick::HTTP::DefaultFileHandler in WEBrick i
    52Plan
  • CVE-2021-28966In Ruby through 3.0 on Windows, a remote attacker can submit a crafted path when a Web application handles a parameter with TmpDir.
    47Plan
  • CVE-2017-14064Ruby through 2.2.7, 2.3.x through 2.3.4, and 2.4.x through 2.4.1 can expose arbitrary memory during a JSON.generate call.
    42Plan
  • CVE-2017-17790The lazy_initialize function in lib/resolv.rb in Ruby through 2.4.3 uses Kernel#open, which might allow Command Injection attacks, as demons
    41Plan
  • CVE-2016-2339An exploitable heap overflow vulnerability exists in the Fiddle::Function.new "initialize" function functionality of Ruby.
    41Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
debian:ruby1.81.8.5-4etch2 · Debian:4.0Package registry (OSV)
debian:ruby1.91.9.0+20060609-1etch2 · Debian:4.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:irb0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-debuginfo0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-devel0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-docs0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-irb0:1.8.5-5.el5_2.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-libs0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-mode0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-rdoc0:1.8.5-5.el5_2.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-ri0:1.8.5-5.el5_2.3 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:5::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby-tcltk0:1.8.1-7.el4_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:4::asPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:ruby3.30:3.3.10-23.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
C · the service can be disrupted
Attack complexity
Low
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
C

CVSS vector

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records