Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Cybozu Office before 6.6 Build 1.3 and Share 360 before 2.5 Build 0.3 allow remote authentic
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 3.4% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 88.7% of all records.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Cybozu Office before 6.6 Build 1.3 and Share 360 before 2.5 Build 0.3 allow remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) sequence via the id parameter in (1) scripts/cbag/ag.exe or (2) scripts/s360v2/s360.exe.
- Published
- Aug 31, 2006
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 3.5% · 89th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 16 / 40 · 4.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 3.5%
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cybozu | cybozu office | cpe:2.3:a:cybozu:cybozu_office |
| cybozu | share 360 | cpe:2.3:a:cybozu:share_360 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cybozu cybozu officeup to 6.6_build_1.2 inclusive
- cybozu share 360up to 2.5_build_0.2 inclusive
Same product
cybozu: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2013-3269Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the aut27Monitor
- CVE-2013-2305Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0, Cybozu Dezie before 8.0.7, and Cybozu Ma27Monitor
- CVE-2013-3656Cybozu Office 9.1.0 and earlier does not properly manage sessions, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging know24Monitor
- CVE-2010-2029Cybozu Office 7 Ktai and Dotsales do not properly restrict access to the login page, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication 23Monitor
- CVE-2006-4492Unspecified vulnerability in Cybozu Office 6.5 Build 1.2 for Windows allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, including user20Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | webapps | 2006-08-28 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-4 d
- Published
- TodayOct 13, 2026+7348 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (8 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.