Recourse ManTrap 1.6 does not properly hide processes from attackers, which could allow attackers to determine that they are in a honeypot s
Recourse ManTrap 1.6 does not properly hide processes from attackers, which could allow attackers to determine that they are in a honeypot system by comparing the results from kill commands with the process listing in the /proc filesystem.
- Published
- Jan 9, 2001
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.2% · 66th percentile
- CWE
- —
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
8
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.2%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| recourse technologies | mantrap | cpe:2.3:a:recourse_technologies:mantrap |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- recourse technologies mantrap1.6.1
Same product
recourse technologies: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2000-1145Recourse ManTrap 1.6 allows attackers who have gained root access to use utilities such as crash or fsdb to read /dev/mem and raw disk devic18Monitor
- CVE-2000-1144Recourse ManTrap 1.6 sets up a chroot environment to hide the fact that it is running, but the inode number for the resulting "/" file syste8Monitor
- CVE-2000-1141Recourse ManTrap 1.6 modifies the kernel so that ".." does not appear in the /proc listing, which allows attackers to determine that they ar8Monitor
- CVE-2000-1146Recourse ManTrap 1.6 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a sequence of commands that navigate into and out of the /proc/self d8Monitor
- CVE-2000-1142Recourse ManTrap 1.6 generates an error when an attacker cd's to /proc/self/cwd and executes the pwd command, which allows attackers to dete8Monitor
- CVE-2000-1143Recourse ManTrap 1.6 hides the first 4 processes that run on a Solaris system, which allows attackers to determine that they are in a honeyp8Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | local | 2000-11-01 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- First PoC-69 d
- Published
- TodaySep 30, 2026+9396 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- P · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Confidentiality impact
- P
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2000-11/0100.html
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5473
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.