Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-59246· NVD / CVE Program· CNA EEF

Zero-length HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frames bypass Mint's header-block byte-size cap and exhaust client memory

Allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a remote HTTP/2 server to exhaust memory on the client host and cause a denial of service. The Mint.HTTP2.handle_continuation/3 function in lib/mint/http2.ex accumulates the header-block fragment carried by each HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frame into a growing conn.headers_being_processed nesting, one level deeper per frame, and only releases it when a frame with the END_HEADERS flag arrives. The only guard on this accumulator is Mint.HTTP2.assert_header_block_within_max_size/2, which sums the byte size of the fragments received so far. Because a CONTINUATION frame is permitted by the protocol to carry a zero-length payload, an unbounded chain of zero-length CONTINUATION frames adds no bytes to the running total, never trips the size cap, and never emits END_HEADERS, yet each frame still nests the accumulator one level deeper. A malicious HTTP/2 server (reachable directly, via an attacker-controlled redirect, via SSRF, or via a man-in-the-middle) can open a stream by sending a HEADERS frame without END_HEADERS and then stream zero-length CONTINUATION frames indefinitely. Client memory grows one cons cell per frame received; sustained bandwidth from the peer drives the BEAM node running the Mint client to memory exhaustion and eventual out-of-memory termination. This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.2.

MediumCVSS 6.3 · v4.0—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 14, 2026
Updated
Jul 15, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 41th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

25

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · EEF
6.3
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • elixir-mint mint

    • 0.1.0 and later · before 1.9.2affected · semver
    • 596ca4304504be68939c4929e0831557097962b8 and later · before 5779de1666344b32aefc4354184ea07f902f73ceaffected · git

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Hexmintfrom 0.1.0 · before 1.9.21.9.2

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-56810mint buffers an entire chunked response chunk in memory in Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-91043HPACK-indexed cookie fields in Mint HTTP/2 responses bypass max_header_list_size and exhaust client memory
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-82728Unbounded HTTP/1 status-line and chunk-extension buffering in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-58229Unbounded HTTP/1 response-header and chunked-trailer accumulation in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-49754HTTP/2 CONTINUATION flood in Mint client via unbounded header-block accumulation
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-48862Unbounded conn.streams growth in Mint HTTP/2 client via unenforced PUSH_PROMISE concurrency
    32Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
elixir-mint mint1.9.2Vendor (CNA)
elixir-mint mint5779de1666344b32aefc4354184ea07f902f73ceVendor (CNA)
Hex:mint1.9.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-568108 days apartmint buffers an entire chunked response chunk in memory in Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-582290 days apartUnbounded HTTP/1 response-header and chunked-trailer accumulation in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4886242 days apartUnbounded conn.streams growth in Mint HTTP/2 client via unenforced PUSH_PROMISE concurrency
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-4975442 days apartHTTP/2 CONTINUATION flood in Mint client via unbounded header-block accumulation
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-8272852 days apartUnbounded HTTP/1 status-line and chunk-extension buffering in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS
    32Monitor
  • CVE-2026-9104376 days apartHPACK-indexed cookie fields in Mint HTTP/2 responses bypass max_header_list_size and exhaust client memory
    32Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records