Zero-length HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frames bypass Mint's header-block byte-size cap and exhaust client memory
Allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a remote HTTP/2 server to exhaust memory on the client host and cause a denial of service. The Mint.HTTP2.handle_continuation/3 function in lib/mint/http2.ex accumulates the header-block fragment carried by each HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frame into a growing conn.headers_being_processed nesting, one level deeper per frame, and only releases it when a frame with the END_HEADERS flag arrives. The only guard on this accumulator is Mint.HTTP2.assert_header_block_within_max_size/2, which sums the byte size of the fragments received so far. Because a CONTINUATION frame is permitted by the protocol to carry a zero-length payload, an unbounded chain of zero-length CONTINUATION frames adds no bytes to the running total, never trips the size cap, and never emits END_HEADERS, yet each frame still nests the accumulator one level deeper. A malicious HTTP/2 server (reachable directly, via an attacker-controlled redirect, via SSRF, or via a man-in-the-middle) can open a stream by sending a HEADERS frame without END_HEADERS and then stream zero-length CONTINUATION frames indefinitely. Client memory grows one cons cell per frame received; sustained bandwidth from the peer drives the BEAM node running the Mint client to memory exhaustion and eventual out-of-memory termination. This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.2.
- Published
- Jul 14, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 41th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-770
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
25
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · EEF
- 6.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (EEF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
elixir-mint mint
- 0.1.0 and later · before 1.9.2affected · semver
- 596ca4304504be68939c4929e0831557097962b8 and later · before 5779de1666344b32aefc4354184ea07f902f73ceaffected · git
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hex | mint | from 0.1.0 · before 1.9.2 | 1.9.2 |
Same product
elixir-mint: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-56810mint buffers an entire chunked response chunk in memory in Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/534Monitor
- CVE-2026-91043HPACK-indexed cookie fields in Mint HTTP/2 responses bypass max_header_list_size and exhaust client memory32Monitor
- CVE-2026-82728Unbounded HTTP/1 status-line and chunk-extension buffering in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS32Monitor
- CVE-2026-58229Unbounded HTTP/1 response-header and chunked-trailer accumulation in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS32Monitor
- CVE-2026-49754HTTP/2 CONTINUATION flood in Mint client via unbounded header-block accumulation32Monitor
- CVE-2026-48862Unbounded conn.streams growth in Mint HTTP/2 client via unenforced PUSH_PROMISE concurrency32Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| elixir-mint mint | 1.9.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| elixir-mint mint | 5779de1666344b32aefc4354184ea07f902f73ce | Vendor (CNA) |
| Hex:mint | 1.9.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Eric Meadows-Jönssonremediation reviewer
- Andrea Leopardiremediation developer
- zx (Jace)finder
- Jonatan Männchen / EEFanalyst
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-568108 days apartmint buffers an entire chunked response chunk in memory in Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/534Monitor
- CVE-2026-582290 days apartUnbounded HTTP/1 response-header and chunked-trailer accumulation in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS32Monitor
- CVE-2026-4886242 days apartUnbounded conn.streams growth in Mint HTTP/2 client via unenforced PUSH_PROMISE concurrency32Monitor
- CVE-2026-4975442 days apartHTTP/2 CONTINUATION flood in Mint client via unbounded header-block accumulation32Monitor
- CVE-2026-8272852 days apartUnbounded HTTP/1 status-line and chunk-extension buffering in Mint causes memory-exhaustion DoS32Monitor
- CVE-2026-9104376 days apartHPACK-indexed cookie fields in Mint HTTP/2 responses bypass max_header_list_size and exhaust client memory32Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-770 · Allocation of Resources Without Limits or ThrottlingCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- FloodingCAPEC-125likelihood: High · Medium
- Excessive AllocationCAPEC-130likelihood: Medium · Medium
- XML Ping of the DeathCAPEC-147likelihood: Low · Medium
- Exponential Data ExpansionCAPEC-197likelihood: High · Medium
- Serialized Data Parameter BlowupCAPEC-229likelihood: High · High
- Serialized Data with Nested PayloadsCAPEC-230likelihood: Medium · High
- Oversized Serialized Data PayloadsCAPEC-231likelihood: Medium · High
- HTTP DoSCAPEC-469Low
ATT&CK techniques
- Network Denial of Service:Direct Network FloodT1498.001
- Network Denial of Service:Reflection AmplificationT1498.002
- Endpoint Denial of ServiceT1499
- Endpoint Denial of Service: OS Exhaustion FloodT1499.001
- Endpoint Denial of Service:Service Exhaustion FloodT1499.002
- Endpoint Denial of Service:Application Exhaustion FloodT1499.003
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59246.html
- github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/5779de1666344b32aefc4354184ea07f902f73ce
- github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-8pf6-g464-h6h9
- osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59246
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.