Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-55432· NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

Coder's sub-agent app registration bypasses template port-sharing policy enforcement

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the `CreateSubAgent` RPC did not validate a requested app sharing level against the template's `MaxPortSharingLevel` before persisting workspace apps, letting a workspace owner exceed the administrator's configured maximum. Exploitation requires the ability to register sub-agent apps in a workspace the attacker controls. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2clamps the sub-agent app sharing level to the template's `MaxPortSharingLevel`. As a workaround, disable wildcard app hostnames (`CODER_WILDCARD_ACCESS_URL`) to block subdomain-based app routing.

MediumCVSS 5.4 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jul 7, 2026
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
EPSS
0.3% · 22th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
5.4
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
codercoder

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • coder coderbefore 2.29.17
  • coder coder2.30.0 and later · before 2.32.7
  • coder coder2.33.0 and later · before 2.33.8
  • coder coder2.34.0 and later · before 2.34.2

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • coder coder

    • >= 2.34.0, < 2.34.2, >= 2.33.0, < 2.33.8, >= 2.30.0, < 2.32.7, < 2.29.17affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Gogithub.com/coder/coderall versions—
Gogithub.com/coder/coder/v2from 2.30.0 · before 2.32.72.32.7
Gogithub.com/coder/coder/v2from 2.33.0 · before 2.33.82.33.8
Gogithub.com/coder/coder/v2from 2.34.0 · before 2.34.22.34.2
Gogithub.com/coder/coder/v2before 2.29.172.29.17

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-46354Coder: PKCS#7 signature bypass in Azure instance identity allows unauthenticated agent token theft
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2026-44454Coder vulnerable to workspace auto-creation via crafted URL parameters without user consent
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2026-55429Coder's workspace app upsert allows cross-workspace agent rebinding via user-controlled app ID
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2026-63443Coder: Workspace agent API insecure redirect handling allowed cross-agent file read and write
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2026-55427Coder vulnerable to SSH config injection via unsanitized server-supplied values in `coder config-ssh`
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2026-55428Coder: Route hijacking through lack of validation of agent-supplied AllowedIPs in tailnet coordinator
    32Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Go:github.com/coder/coder/v22.29.17Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/coder/coder/v22.32.7Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/coder/coder/v22.33.8Package registry (OSV)
Go:github.com/coder/coder/v22.34.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-554330 days apartCoder: Devcontainer recreate endpoint missing write authorization allows read-only roles to destroy containers
    21Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
low · data can be read
Integrity
low · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
Low
Integrity impact
Low
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records