Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2026-4948· NVD / CVE Program· CNA redhat

Firewalld: firewalld: local unprivileged user can modify firewall state due to d-bus setter mis-authorization

A flaw was found in firewalld. A local unprivileged user can exploit this vulnerability by mis-authorizing two runtime D-Bus (Desktop Bus) setters, setZoneSettings2 and setPolicySettings. This mis-authorization allows the user to modify the runtime firewall state without proper authentication, leading to unauthorized changes in network security configurations.

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Mar 27, 2026
Updated
Sep 16, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 7th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · redhat
5.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
firewalldfirewalld
redhatenterprise linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • firewalld firewalldup to 2.4.0 inclusive
  • redhat enterprise linux7.0

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

    • 0:2.4.2-1.el10_2 and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support

    • 0:2.3.1-1.el10_0.1 and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7

    • all versionsaffected
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

    • all versionsaffected
  • Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

    • 0:1.3.4-20.el9_8 and laternot affected · rpm
    • 0:1.3.4-20.el9_8 and laternot affected · rpm
  • Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4

    • all versionsaffected
    • all versionsunknown

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:9firewall-appletbefore 1.3.4-20.el9_81.3.4-20.el9_8
AlmaLinux:9firewall-configbefore 1.3.4-20.el9_81.3.4-20.el9_8
AlmaLinux:9firewalldbefore 1.3.4-20.el9_81.3.4-20.el9_8
AlmaLinux:9firewalld-filesystembefore 1.3.4-20.el9_81.3.4-20.el9_8
AlmaLinux:9python3-firewallbefore 1.3.4-20.el9_81.3.4-20.el9_8
Debian:12firewalldbefore 1.3.3-1~deb12u21.3.3-1~deb12u2
Debian:13firewalldbefore 2.3.1-1+deb13u12.3.1-1+deb13u1
Debian:14firewalldbefore 2.4.0-22.4.0-2
openSUSE:Leap 16.0firewalldbefore 2.1.2-160000.3.12.1.2-160000.3.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedfirewalldbefore 2.3.2-2.12.3.2-2.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0firewall-appletbefore 0:2.3.1-1.el10_0.10:2.3.1-1.el10_0.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0firewall-configbefore 0:2.3.1-1.el10_0.10:2.3.1-1.el10_0.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0firewalldbefore 0:2.3.1-1.el10_0.10:2.3.1-1.el10_0.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0firewalld-filesystembefore 0:2.3.1-1.el10_0.10:2.3.1-1.el10_0.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux_eus:10.0python3-firewallbefore 0:2.3.1-1.el10_0.10:2.3.1-1.el10_0.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2firewall-appletbefore 0:2.4.2-1.el10_20:2.4.2-1.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2firewall-configbefore 0:2.4.2-1.el10_20:2.4.2-1.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2firewalldbefore 0:2.4.2-1.el10_20:2.4.2-1.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2firewalld-filesystembefore 0:2.4.2-1.el10_20:2.4.2-1.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2python3-firewallbefore 0:2.4.2-1.el10_20:2.4.2-1.el10_2
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamfirewall-appletbefore 0:1.3.4-20.el9_80:1.3.4-20.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamfirewall-configbefore 0:1.3.4-20.el9_80:1.3.4-20.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseosfirewalldbefore 0:1.3.4-20.el9_80:1.3.4-20.el9_8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseosfirewalld-filesystembefore 0:1.3.4-20.el9_80:1.3.4-20.el9_8

+6

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2016-5410firewalld.py in firewalld before 0.4.3.3 allows local users to bypass authentication and modify firewall configurations via the (1) addPasst
    22Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
almalinux:firewall-applet1.3.4-20.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:firewall-config1.3.4-20.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:firewalld1.3.4-20.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:firewalld-filesystem1.3.4-20.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:python3-firewall1.3.4-20.el9_8 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
debian:firewalld1.3.3-1~deb12u2 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:firewalld2.3.2-2.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:firewall-applet0:2.4.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:firewall-config0:2.4.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:firewalld0:2.4.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:firewalld-filesystem0:2.4.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
red hat:python3-firewall0:2.4.2-1.el10_2 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:firewalld0:1.3.4-20.el9_8 · Rocky Linux:9Package registry (OSV)
suse:firewalld2.0.0-slfo.1.1_2.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1Package registry (OSV)
suse:rpcbind1.2.9-1.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records