Symfony: Mailomat Mailer Webhook Parser Reads the HMAC Algorithm from the Request: Signature Algorithm Downgrade
Symfony is a PHP framework for web and console applications and a set of reusable PHP components. Prior to 7.4.13 and 8.0.13, MailomatRequestParser::validateSignature() parsed X-MOM-Webhook-Signature as algo=signature and passed the request-selected algorithm to hash_hmac(), allowing a signature algorithm downgrade instead of enforcing Mailomat's documented SHA-256 webhook signature. This issue is fixed in versions 7.4.13 and 8.0.13.
- Published
- Jul 14, 2026
- Updated
- Jul 15, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 14th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-347
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
25
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 6.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| sensiolabs | symfony | cpe:2.3:a:sensiolabs:symfony |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- sensiolabs symfony7.2.0 and later · before 7.4.13
- sensiolabs symfony8.0.0 and later · before 8.0.13
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
symfony mailomat-mailer
- >= 7.2.0, < 7.4.12, >= 8.0.0-BETA1, < 8.0.13affected
symfony symfony
- >= 7.2.0, < 7.4.12, >= 8.0.0-BETA1, < 8.0.13affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:14 | symfony | before 7.4.13+dfsg-1 | 7.4.13+dfsg-1 |
| Packagist | symfony/mailomat-mailer | from 7.2.0 · before 7.4.13 | 7.4.13 |
| Packagist | symfony/mailomat-mailer | from 8.0.0 · before 8.0.13 | 8.0.13 |
| Packagist | symfony/symfony | from 7.2.0 · before 7.4.13 | 7.4.13 |
| Packagist | symfony/symfony | from 8.0.0 · before 8.0.13 | 8.0.13 |
Same product
sensiolabs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-18889An issue was discovered in Symfony 3.4.0 through 3.4.34, 4.2.0 through 4.2.11, and 4.3.0 through 4.3.7.49Plan
- CVE-2018-14773An issue was discovered in Http Foundation in Symfony 2.7.0 through 2.7.48, 2.8.0 through 2.8.43, 3.3.0 through 3.3.17, 3.4.0 through 3.4.1343Plan
- CVE-2019-10910In Symfony before 2.7.51, 2.8.x before 2.8.50, 3.x before 3.4.26, 4.x before 4.1.12, and 4.2.x before 4.2.7, when service ids allow user inp41Plan
- CVE-2019-11325An issue was discovered in Symfony before 4.2.12 and 4.3.x before 4.3.8.40Plan
- CVE-2017-11365Certain Symfony products are affected by: Incorrect Access Control.40Plan
- CVE-2019-10913In Symfony before 2.7.51, 2.8.x before 2.8.50, 3.x before 3.4.26, 4.x before 4.1.12, and 4.2.x before 4.2.7, HTTP Methods provided as verbs 40Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:symfony | 7.4.13+dfsg-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:symfony/mailomat-mailer | 7.4.13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:symfony/mailomat-mailer | 8.0.13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:symfony/symfony | 7.4.13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:symfony/symfony | 8.0.13 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic SignatureCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-347 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);Fixed
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, { algorithms: ["RS256"], issuer: "https://id.example.com", audience: "portal",});Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/bdfe9fe0d94d33dfaca0bc2fe0b00b54767b0c88
- github.com/symfony/symfony/releases/tag/v7.4.13
- github.com/symfony/symfony/releases/tag/v8.0.13
- github.com/symfony/symfony/security/advisories/GHSA-rrj9-5q2j-4gvr
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.