Feast: feast: unsafe dill deserialization of registry-stored udfs — rce on feature server and registry server
A flaw was found in Feast. The system improperly deserializes user-defined functions (UDFs) stored in its registry, which are serialized using the 'dill' library. This allows a remote attacker to store a malicious UDF, leading to unauthenticated arbitrary code execution on the feature server in default configurations. An authenticated attacker can also achieve arbitrary code execution on the registry server by bypassing authorization checks during deserialization. This vulnerability can result in cross-tenant data access and lateral movement within the system.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for help- Published
- Aug 10, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 28, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.1% · 64th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-502
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
39
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 9.9
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25
- 1786110051 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3
- 1786110033 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4
- 1786107278 and laternot affected · rpm
- 1787068065 and laternot affected · rpm
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-15378Guardrails-detectors: guardrails-detectors: ssrf and local file read via user-supplied xml schema (xml-with-schema:)37Monitor
- CVE-2026-18982Odh-training-operator-rhel9: rhoai fork aggregates training job create onto native edit/admin clusterroles35Monitor
- CVE-2026-18950Odh-dashboard: odh-dashboard: confused-deputy privilege escalation via unchecked roleref in rolebinding creation35Monitor
- CVE-2026-18949Odh-dashboard: odh-dashboard: clusterrole grants cluster-wide crud on secrets and rbac management resources35Monitor
- CVE-2026-18617Data-science-pipelines-operator: dspo: mysql dsn parameter injection via customextraparams enables local infile file exfiltration from operator pod35Monitor
- CVE-2026-16745Odh-dashboard: odh-dashboard: backend port 8080 trusts x-forwarded-access-token without origin validation35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-1674518 days apartOdh-dashboard: odh-dashboard: backend port 8080 trusts x-forwarded-access-token without origin validation35Monitor
- CVE-2026-155810 days apartTrustyai-service-operator: trustyai-service-operator: tas internal service bypasses kube-rbac-proxy, exposing unauthenticated quarkus api cluster-wide32Monitor
- CVE-2026-189410 days apartFeast: feast-operator: feast: default authentication mode is no_auth — shared multi-tenant instances deployed without authentication30Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-502 · Deserialization of Untrusted DataCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
Data received over the network is deserialized into the language’s native object format without verifying its source. Code paths inside the object can be triggered during deserialization.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-502 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
payload = sock.recv(65536)job = pickle.loads(payload)Fixed
payload = sock.recv(65536)if not hmac.compare_digest(sign(payload), header_sig): raise PermissionError("invalid signature")job = JobSchema.validate(json.loads(payload))Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:53261
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:53262
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:53263
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18948
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2511167
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.