OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie RG-EW1800GX PRO B11P226_EW1800GX-PRO_10223117 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands
OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie RG-EW1800GX PRO B11P226_EW1800GX-PRO_10223117 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted POST request to the module_set in file /usr/local/lua/dev_sta/nbr_cwmp.lua.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for help- Published
- Dec 11, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.1% · 80th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ruijie | rg-yst250f firmware | cpe:2.3:o:ruijie:rg-yst250f_firmware |
| ruijie | rg-yst250f | cpe:2.3:h:ruijie:rg-yst250f |
| ruijie | rg-est310 v2 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:ruijie:rg-est310_v2_firmware |
| ruijie | rg-est310 v2 | cpe:2.3:h:ruijie:rg-est310_v2 |
| ruijie | reyee os | cpe:2.3:o:ruijie:reyee_os |
| ruijie | rg-est350 v2 | cpe:2.3:h:ruijie:rg-est350_v2 |
| ruijie | rg-ew300 pro | cpe:2.3:h:ruijie:rg-ew300_pro |
| ruijie | rg-eap602 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:ruijie:rg-eap602_firmware |
| ruijie | rg-eap602 | cpe:2.3:h:ruijie:rg-eap602 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ruijie reyee os219
- ruijie reyee os221
- ruijie rg-eap602 firmware3.0(1)b2p55
- ruijie rg-est310 v2 firmwareb11p221
- ruijie rg-yst250f firmware3.0(1)b11p280yst250f
Same product
ruijie: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-56083OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie X30-PRO X30-PRO-V1_09241521 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted POST36Monitor
- CVE-2025-56113OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie RG-YST EST, YSTAP_3.0(1)B11P280YST250F V1.xxV2.xx allowing attackers to execute arbitrary comma35Monitor
- CVE-2025-56099OS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie RG-YST AP_3.0(1)B11P280YST250F allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted P35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-560830 days apartOS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie X30-PRO X30-PRO-V1_09241521 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted POST36Monitor
- CVE-2025-560990 days apartOS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie RG-YST AP_3.0(1)B11P280YST250F allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted P35Monitor
- CVE-2025-561130 days apartOS Command Injection vulnerability in Ruijie RG-YST EST, YSTAP_3.0(1)B11P280YST250F V1.xxV2.xx allowing attackers to execute arbitrary comma35Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- 1drv.ms/f/c/12406a392c92914b/Eohr-0awt6VAuiLCNhCG0rgBLQip6nJpl-9Hy0OqB4MvFg?e=DIfBxi
- 1drv.ms/t/c/12406a392c92914b/EdfdfnvOxAhJqdeIGlRRo6ABHJz03PPPBYIMdLoD6iNhlg?e=qNhi6o
- github.com/flegoity/Ruijie-Multiple-Devices-Vulnerability-Reports-for-CVE/blob/main/CVE-2025-56084.md
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.