Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2025-47151· NVD / CVE Program· CNA talos

A type confusion vulnerability exists in the lasso_node_impl_init_from_xml functionality of Entr'ouvert Lasso 2.5.1 and 2.8.2.

A type confusion vulnerability exists in the lasso_node_impl_init_from_xml functionality of Entr'ouvert Lasso 2.5.1 and 2.8.2. A specially crafted SAML response can lead to an arbitrary code execution. An attacker can send a malformed SAML response to trigger this vulnerability.

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Nov 5, 2025
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
1.1% · 63th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

39

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.1%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · talos
9.8
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
entrouvertlasso

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • entrouvert lasso2.5.1
  • entrouvert lasso2.8.2

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (talos). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Entr'ouvert Lasso

    • 2.5.1, 2.8.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:8lassobefore 2.6.0-14.el8_102.6.0-14.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8lasso-develbefore 2.6.0-14.el8_102.6.0-14.el8_10
AlmaLinux:8python3-lassobefore 2.6.0-14.el8_102.6.0-14.el8_10
AlmaLinux:9lassobefore 2.7.0-11.el9_7.32.7.0-11.el9_7.3
AlmaLinux:9lasso-develbefore 2.7.0-11.el9_7.32.7.0-11.el9_7.3
AlmaLinux:9python3-lassobefore 2.7.0-11.el9_7.32.7.0-11.el9_7.3
Debian:11lassobefore 2.6.1-3+deb11u12.6.1-3+deb11u1
Debian:12lassobefore 2.8.1-1+deb12u12.8.1-1+deb12u1
Debian:13lassobefore 2.8.2-9+deb13u12.8.2-9+deb13u1
Debian:14lassobefore 2.9.0-12.9.0-1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0lassobefore 2.8.2-160000.3.12.8.2-160000.3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamjava-lasso-debuginfobefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlassobefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlasso-debuginfobefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlasso-debugsourcebefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamperl-lasso-debuginfobefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreampython3-lassobefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreampython3-lasso-debuginfobefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crblasso-develbefore 0:2.6.0-14.el8_100:2.6.0-14.el8_10
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlassobefore 0:2.7.0-11.el9_7.30:2.7.0-11.el9_7.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlasso-debuginfobefore 0:2.7.0-11.el9_7.30:2.7.0-11.el9_7.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlasso-debugsourcebefore 0:2.7.0-11.el9_7.30:2.7.0-11.el9_7.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamperl-lasso-debuginfobefore 0:2.7.0-11.el9_7.30:2.7.0-11.el9_7.3
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreampython3-lassobefore 0:2.7.0-11.el9_7.30:2.7.0-11.el9_7.3

+63

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2025-46784A denial of service vulnerability exists in the lasso_node_init_from_message_with_format functionality of Entr'ouvert Lasso 2.5.1.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-46705A denial of service vulnerability exists in the g_assert_not_reached functionality of Entr'ouvert Lasso 2.5.1 and 2.8.2.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-46404A denial of service vulnerability exists in the lasso_provider_verify_saml_signature functionality of Entr'ouvert Lasso 2.5.1.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2021-28091Lasso all versions prior to 2.7.0 has improper verification of a cryptographic signature.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2009-0050Lasso 2.2.1 and earlier does not properly check the return value from the OpenSSL DSA_verify function, which allows remote attackers to bypa
    17Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
almalinux:lasso2.7.0-11.el9_7.3 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:lasso-devel2.7.0-11.el9_7.3 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:python3-lasso2.7.0-11.el9_7.3 · AlmaLinux:9Package registry (OSV)
debian:lasso2.8.1-1+deb12u1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:lasso2.8.2-150600.3.5.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
red hat:java-lasso-debuginfo0:2.6.0-8.el8_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lasso0:2.6.0-8.el8_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lasso-debuginfo0:2.6.0-8.el8_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lasso-debugsource0:2.6.0-8.el8_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lasso-devel0:2.7.0-11.el9_4.1 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.4::crbPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:lasso-python0:2.5.1-8.el7_9.1 · Red Hat:rhel_els:7Package registry (OSV)
red hat:perl-lasso-debuginfo0:2.6.0-8.el8_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:python3-lasso0:2.6.0-13.el8_8.1 · Red Hat:rhel_e4s:8.8::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:python3-lasso-debuginfo0:2.6.0-8.el8_2.1 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
rocky linux:lasso0:2.7.0-11.el9_7.3 · Rocky Linux:9Package registry (OSV)
suse:lasso2.8.2-150600.3.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6Package registry (OSV)
suse:lasso2.8.2-160000.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

All records