Aap-gateway: aap-gateway privilege escalation
A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Concurrent requests handled by the gateway grpc service can result in concurrency issues due to race condition requests against the proxy. This issue potentially allows a less privileged user to obtain the JWT of a greater privileged user, enabling the server to be jeopardized. A user session or confidential data might be vulnerable.
- Published
- Mar 3, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 23th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-362
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 8.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ansible.com automation-gateway
- 2.5.0 and later · before 2.5.20250305-1affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
- 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9
- 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | automation-gateway | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | automation-gateway-config | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | automation-gateway-server | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9 | automation-gateway | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9 | automation-gateway-config | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9 | automation-gateway-server | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-11807Eda-server: websocket missing authorization allows credential theft via activation_id spoofing38Monitor
- CVE-2026-12701Pulpcore: pulpcore: relative_path_validator bypass via directory traversal in filesystemexport36Monitor
- CVE-2025-49521Event-driven-ansible: template injection via git branch and refspec in eda projects35Monitor
- CVE-2025-49520Event-driven-ansible: authenticated argument injection in git url in eda project creation35Monitor
- CVE-2026-84691Automation-controller: automation-controller-container: automation-controller: format string injection in the api 4xx error log setting discloses django secret_34Monitor
- CVE-2026-84683Automation-controller: automation-controller-container: automation-controller: stored cross-site scripting in the job stdout html view via ansi osc 8 hyperlink 34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ansible.com automation-gateway | 2.5.20250305-1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| red hat:automation-gateway | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-gateway-config | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-gateway-server | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1954
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1801
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2349081
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.