Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2024-47813· NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

Wasmtime race condition could lead to WebAssembly control-flow integrity and type safety violations

Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly. Under certain concurrent event orderings, a `wasmtime::Engine`'s internal type registry was susceptible to double-unregistration bugs due to a race condition, leading to panics and potentially type registry corruption. That registry corruption could, following an additional and particular sequence of concurrent events, lead to violations of WebAssembly's control-flow integrity (CFI) and type safety. Users that do not use `wasmtime::Engine` across multiple threads are not affected. Users that only create new modules across threads over time are additionally not affected. Reproducing this bug requires creating and dropping multiple type instances (such as `wasmtime::FuncType` or `wasmtime::ArrayType`) concurrently on multiple threads, where all types are associated with the same `wasmtime::Engine`. **Wasm guests cannot trigger this bug.** See the "References" section below for a list of Wasmtime types-related APIs that are affected. Wasmtime maintains an internal registry of types within a `wasmtime::Engine` and an engine is shareable across threads. Types can be created and referenced through creation of a `wasmtime::Module`, creation of `wasmtime::FuncType`, or a number of other APIs where the host creates a function (see "References" below). Each of these cases interacts with an engine to deduplicate type information and manage type indices that are used to implement type checks in WebAssembly's `call_indirect` function, for example. This bug is a race condition in this management where the internal type registry could be corrupted to trigger an assert or contain invalid state. Wasmtime's internal representation of a type has individual types (e.g. one-per-host-function) maintain a registration count of how many time it's been used. Types additionally have state within an engine behind a read-write lock such as lookup/deduplication information. The race here is a time-of-check versus time-of-use (TOCTOU) bug where one thread atomically decrements a type entry's registration count, observes zero registrations, and then acquires a lock in order to unregister that entry. However, between when this first thread observed the zero-registration count and when it acquires that lock, another thread could perform the following sequence of events: re-register another copy of the type, which deduplicates to that same entry, resurrecting it and incrementing its registration count; then drop the type and decrement its registration count; observe that the registration count is now zero; acquire the type registry lock; and finally unregister the type. Now, when the original thread finally acquires the lock and unregisters the entry, it is the second time this entry has been unregistered. This bug was originally introduced in Wasmtime 19's development of the WebAssembly GC proposal. This bug affects users who are not using the GC proposal, however, and affects Wasmtime in its default configuration even when the GC proposal is disabled. Wasmtime users using 19.0.0 and after are all affected by this issue. We have released the following Wasmtime versions, all of which have a fix for this bug: * 21.0.2 * 22.0.1 * 23.0.3 * 24.0.1 * 25.0.2. If your application creates and drops Wasmtime types on multiple threads concurrently, there are no known workarounds. Users are encouraged to upgrade to a patched release.

LowCVSS 2.9 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Oct 9, 2024
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 4th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

11

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
11 / 40 · 2.9 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
2.9
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
bytecodealliancewasmtime

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • bytecodealliance wasmtime19.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime19.0.1
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime19.0.2
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime20.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime20.0.1
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime20.0.2
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime21.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime21.0.1
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime22.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime23.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime23.0.1
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime23.0.2
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime24.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime25.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime25.0.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • bytecodealliance wasmtime

    • >= 19.0.0, < 21.0.2, >= 22.0.0, < 22.0.1, >= 23.0.0, < 23.0.3, >= 24.0.0, < 24.0.1, >= 25.0.0, < 25.0.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
crates.iowasmtimefrom 19.0.0 · before 21.0.221.0.2
crates.iowasmtimefrom 22.0.0 · before 22.0.122.0.1
crates.iowasmtimefrom 23.0.0 · before 23.0.323.0.3
crates.iowasmtimefrom 24.0.0 · before 24.0.124.0.1
crates.iowasmtimefrom 25.0.0 · before 25.0.225.0.2
Debian:13rust-wasmtimebefore 21.0.2+dfsg-121.0.2+dfsg-1
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 21.0.0—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 21.0.1—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 22.0.0—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 23.0.0—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 19.0.0—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 23.0.2—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 24.0.0—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 25.0.0—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 25.0.1—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 23.0.1—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 19.0.1—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 19.0.2—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 20.0.0—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 20.0.1—
PyPIwasmtimeup to and including 20.0.2—

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2022-39394wasmtime_trap_code C API function has out of bounds write vulnerability
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2022-24791Use after free in Wasmtime
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34987Wasmtime with Winch compiler backend on aarch64 may allow a sandbox-escaping memory access
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2026-34971Wasmtime miscompiled guest heap access enables sandbox escape on aarch64 Cranelift
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2023-30624Wasmtime has Undefined Behavior in Rust runtime functions
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2022-39393Wasmtime vulnerable to data leakage between instances in the pooling allocator
    34Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
crates.io:wasmtime21.0.2Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime22.0.1Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime23.0.3Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime24.0.1Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime25.0.2Package registry (OSV)
debian:rust-wasmtime21.0.2+dfsg-1 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • Administrator privileges are required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
low · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
low · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
High
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
Low
Availability impact
Low

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records