eNMS 4.0.0 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via get_tree_files.
- Published
- Sep 20, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.9% · 57th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.9%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| enms | enms | cpe:2.3:a:enms:enms |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- enms enms4.4.0
Same product
enms: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-11664eNMS TGZ File controller.py multiselect_filtering path traversal35Monitor
- CVE-2024-46649eNMS up to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via download/folder.30Monitor
- CVE-2024-46648eNMS 4.4.0 to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via scan_folder.30Monitor
- CVE-2024-46647eNMS 4.4.0 to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via upload_files.26Monitor
- CVE-2024-46646eNMS up to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via /download/file.26Monitor
- CVE-2024-46644eNMS 4.4.0 to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via edit_file.26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-1166466 days aparteNMS TGZ File controller.py multiselect_filtering path traversal35Monitor
- CVE-2024-466480 days aparteNMS 4.4.0 to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via scan_folder.30Monitor
- CVE-2024-466490 days aparteNMS up to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via download/folder.30Monitor
- CVE-2024-466440 days aparteNMS 4.4.0 to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via edit_file.26Monitor
- CVE-2024-466460 days aparteNMS up to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via /download/file.26Monitor
- CVE-2024-466470 days aparteNMS 4.4.0 to 4.7.1 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal via upload_files.26Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) { return res.sendStatus(400);}res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.