An issue was discovered on certain GL-iNet devices, including MT6000, MT3000, MT2500, AXT1800, and AX1800 4.6.2.
An issue was discovered on certain GL-iNet devices, including MT6000, MT3000, MT2500, AXT1800, and AX1800 4.6.2. The params parameter in the call method of the /rpc endpoint is vulnerable to arbitrary directory traversal, which enables attackers to execute scripts under any path.
- Published
- Oct 24, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| gl-inet | mt2500 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:gl-inet:mt2500_firmware |
| gl-inet | mt2500 | cpe:2.3:h:gl-inet:mt2500 |
| gl-inet | axt1800 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:gl-inet:axt1800_firmware |
| gl-inet | axt1800 | cpe:2.3:h:gl-inet:axt1800 |
| gl-inet | ax1800 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:gl-inet:ax1800_firmware |
| gl-inet | ax1800 | cpe:2.3:h:gl-inet:ax1800 |
| gl-inet | b3000 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:gl-inet:b3000_firmware |
| gl-inet | b3000 | cpe:2.3:h:gl-inet:b3000 |
| gl-inet | a1300 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:gl-inet:a1300_firmware |
| gl-inet | a1300 | cpe:2.3:h:gl-inet:a1300 |
| gl-inet | x300b firmware | cpe:2.3:o:gl-inet:x300b_firmware |
| gl-inet | x300b | cpe:2.3:h:gl-inet:x300b |
and 30 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- gl-inet a1300 firmware4.5.17
- gl-inet ar300m firmware4.3.17
- gl-inet ar300m16 firmware4.3.17
- gl-inet ar750 firmware4.3.17
- gl-inet ar750s firmware4.3.17
- gl-inet ax1800 firmware4.6.2 and later · before 4.6.4
- gl-inet axt1800 firmware4.6.2 and later · before 4.6.4
- gl-inet b1300 firmware4.3.17
- gl-inet b3000 firmware4.5.18
- gl-inet e750 firmware4.3.17
- gl-inet mt1300 firmware4.3.18
- gl-inet mt2500 firmware4.6.2 and later · before 4.6.4
- gl-inet mt3000 firmware4.6.2
- gl-inet mt300n-v2 firmware4.3.17
- gl-inet mt6000 firmware4.6.2
- gl-inet sft1200 firmware4.3.18
- gl-inet x3000 firmware4.4.9
- gl-inet x300b firmware4.5.17
- gl-inet x750 firmware4.3.18
- gl-inet xe300 firmware4.3.17
Same product
gl-inet: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-45261An issue was discovered on certain GL-iNet devices, including MT6000, MT3000, MT2500, AXT1800, and AX1800 4.6.2.32Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) { return res.sendStatus(400);}res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.