Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2024-32812· NVD / CVE Program· CNA Patchstack

WordPress Podlove Podcast Publisher plugin <= 4.0.11 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Podlove Podlove Podcast Publisher.This issue affects Podlove Podcast Publisher: from n/a through 4.0.11.

MediumCVSS 5.4 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Apr 24, 2024
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 30th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

21

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
5.4
CNA · Patchstack
5.4
agree

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

VendorProduct
podlovepodlove podcast publisher

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • podlove podlove podcast publisherbefore 4.0.12

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Patchstack). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Podlove Podlove Podcast Publisher

    • n/a and later · up to and including 4.0.11affectedfixed in 4.0.12

Same product

podlove: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2021-24666Podlove Podcast Publisher < 3.5.6 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection
    42Plan
  • CVE-2016-10942The podlove-podcasting-plugin-for-wordpress plugin before 2.3.16 for WordPress has SQL injection via the insert_id parameter exploitable via
    40Plan
  • CVE-2024-43984WordPress Podlove Podcast Publisher plugin <= 4.1.13 - CSRF to Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2024-32143WordPress Podlove Podcast Publisher plugin <= 4.1.0 - Broken Access Control vulnerability
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2024-32139WordPress Podlove Podcast Publisher plugin <= 4.0.12 - SQL Injection vulnerability
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2023-25472WordPress Podlove Podcast Publisher Plugin <= 3.8.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
    35Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
Podlove Podlove Podcast Publisher4.0.12Vendor (CNA)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
low · data can be read
Integrity
low · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
Low
Integrity impact
Low
Availability impact
None

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records