CVE-2023-28480· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

An issue was discovered in Tigergraph Enterprise 3.7.0.

An issue was discovered in Tigergraph Enterprise 3.7.0. The TigerGraph platform allows users to define new User Defined Functions (UDFs) from C/C++ code. To support this functionality TigerGraph allows users to upload custom C/C++ code which is then compiled and installed into the platform. An attacker who has filesystem access on a remote TigerGraph system can alter the behavior of the database against the will of the database administrator; thus effectively bypassing the built in RBAC controls.

MediumCVSS 6.5 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded

File upload

Published: Aug 14, 2023
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 0.6% · 49th percentile
CWE: CWE-434

Follow this CVE

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.6%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: proof of concept
Automatable: no
Technical impact: partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Vendor	Product	CPE
tigergraph	tigergraph	cpe:2.3:a:tigergraph:tigergraph

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

tigergraph tigergraph3.7.0

Same product

tigergraph: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2023-28479An issue was discovered in Tigergraph Enterprise 3.7.0.
35Monitor
CVE-2023-28483An issue was discovered in Tigergraph Enterprise 3.7.0.
35Monitor
CVE-2023-28481An issue was discovered in Tigergraph Enterprise 3.7.0.
35Monitor
CVE-2022-30331The User-Defined Functions (UDF) feature in TigerGraph 3.6.0 allows installation of a query (in the GSQL query language) without proper vali
35Monitor
CVE-2023-28482An issue was discovered in Tigergraph Enterprise 3.7.0.
26Monitor
CVE-2023-22950An issue was discovered in TigerGraph Enterprise Free Edition 3.x.
26Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).