IBM CICS TX 11.1 could allow allow an attacker with physical access to the system to execute code due using a back and refresh attack.

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

• ibm cics tx11.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (ibm). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

• IBM CICS TX Advanced

  • 11.1affected

• IBM CICS TX Standard

  • 11.1affected

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

• CVE-2022-31767IBM CICS TX Standard and Advanced 11.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially craf
  41Plan
• CVE-2024-41744IBM CICS TX Standard cross-site request forgery
  35Monitor
• CVE-2022-34161IBM CICS TX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions tra
  35Monitor
• CVE-2025-1331IBM CICS TX code execution
  31Monitor
• CVE-2025-1330IBM CICS TX code execution
  31Monitor
• CVE-2025-1329IBM CICS TX code execution
  31Monitor

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Root cause

User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

1const host = req.body.host;2exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);

1const host = req.body.host;2if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);3execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.