Zephyr Project Manager REST Call cross site scripting
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Zephyr Project Manager up to 3.2.4. Affected is an unknown function of the file /v1/tasks/create/ of the component REST Call Handler. The manipulation of the argument onanimationstart leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 3.2.5 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-209370 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.
- Published
- Sep 28, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 42th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-707
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 5.4
- CNA · VulDB
- 3.5
- 1.9 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| zephyr-one | zephyr project manager | cpe:2.3:a:zephyr-one:zephyr_project_manager |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- zephyr-one zephyr project managerbefore 3.2.5
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Zephyr Project Manager
- 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4affected
Same product
zephyr-one: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-2840Zephyr Project Manager < 3.2.5 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQLi43Plan
- CVE-2024-43322WordPress Zephyr Project Manager plugin <= 3.3.100 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability39Monitor
- CVE-2024-37484WordPress Zephyr Project Manager plugin <= 3.3.97 - Privilege Escalation vulnerability35Monitor
- CVE-2024-7624Zephyr Project Manager <= 3.3.101 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Limited Privilege Escalation32Monitor
- CVE-2024-38761WordPress Zephyr Project Manager plugin <= 3.3.99 - Sensitive Data Exposure via Export File vulnerability30Monitor
- CVE-2025-32526WordPress Zephyr Project Manager plugin <= 3.3.101 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Zephyr Project Manager | 3.2.5 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-707 · Improper NeutralizationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- XML InjectionCAPEC-250likelihood: High
- Inter-component Protocol ManipulationCAPEC-276
- Data Interchange Protocol ManipulationCAPEC-277
- Web Services Protocol ManipulationCAPEC-278
- SOAP ManipulationCAPEC-279likelihood: Medium · High
- Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input FiltersCAPEC-3likelihood: Medium · Medium
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Generic Cross-Browser Cross-Domain TheftCAPEC-468Medium
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.