Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2022-2058· NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitLab

Divide By Zero error in tiffcrop in libtiff 4.4.0 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file.

Divide By Zero error in tiffcrop in libtiff 4.4.0 allows attackers to cause a denial-of-service via a crafted tiff file. For users that compile libtiff from sources, the fix is available with commit f3a5e010.

MediumCVSS 6.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jun 30, 2022
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
1.3% · 70th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

26

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
26 / 40 · 6.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.3%

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
6.5
CNA · GitLab
5.5
1.0 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
libtifflibtiff
netappactive iq unified manager
fedoraprojectfedora
debiandebian linux

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • debian debian linux10.0
  • debian debian linux11.0
  • fedoraproject fedora35
  • fedoraproject fedora36
  • libtiff libtiff4.4.0
  • netapp active iq unified managerall versions

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitLab). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • libtiff libtiff

    • =4.4.0affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:8libtiffbefore 4.0.9-26.el8_74.0.9-26.el8_7
AlmaLinux:8libtiff-develbefore 4.0.9-26.el8_74.0.9-26.el8_7
AlmaLinux:8libtiff-toolsbefore 4.0.9-26.el8_74.0.9-26.el8_7
AlmaLinux:9libtiffbefore 4.4.0-5.el9_14.4.0-5.el9_1
AlmaLinux:9libtiff-develbefore 4.4.0-5.el9_14.4.0-5.el9_1
AlmaLinux:9libtiff-toolsbefore 4.4.0-5.el9_14.4.0-5.el9_1
Alpine:v3.15tiffbefore 4.4.0-r34.4.0-r3
Alpine:v3.17tiffbefore 4.4.0-r14.4.0-r1
Debian:10tiffbefore 4.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u54.1.0+git191117-2~deb10u5
Debian:11tiffbefore 4.2.0-1+deb11u34.2.0-1+deb11u3
Debian:12tiffbefore 4.4.0-34.4.0-3
openSUSE:Tumbleweedtiffbefore 4.4.0-2.14.4.0-2.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibtiffbefore 0:4.0.9-26.el8_70:4.0.9-26.el8_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibtiff-debuginfobefore 0:4.0.9-26.el8_70:4.0.9-26.el8_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibtiff-debugsourcebefore 0:4.0.9-26.el8_70:4.0.9-26.el8_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibtiff-develbefore 0:4.0.9-26.el8_70:4.0.9-26.el8_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamlibtiff-tools-debuginfobefore 0:4.0.9-26.el8_70:4.0.9-26.el8_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crblibtiff-toolsbefore 0:4.0.9-26.el8_70:4.0.9-26.el8_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlibtiffbefore 0:4.4.0-5.el9_10:4.4.0-5.el9_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlibtiff-debuginfobefore 0:4.4.0-5.el9_10:4.4.0-5.el9_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlibtiff-debugsourcebefore 0:4.4.0-5.el9_10:4.4.0-5.el9_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlibtiff-develbefore 0:4.4.0-5.el9_10:4.4.0-5.el9_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamlibtiff-tools-debuginfobefore 0:4.4.0-5.el9_10:4.4.0-5.el9_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crblibtiff-toolsbefore 0:4.4.0-5.el9_10:4.4.0-5.el9_1

+5

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2006-3459Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the TIFF library (libtiff) before 3.8.2, as used in Adobe Reader 9.3.0 and other products, allow co
    46Plan
  • CVE-2004-1308Integer overflow in (1) tif_dirread.c and (2) tif_fax3.c for libtiff 3.5.7 and 3.7.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a
    44Plan
  • CVE-2018-12900Heap-based buffer overflow in the cpSeparateBufToContigBuf function in tiffcp.c in LibTIFF 3.9.3, 3.9.4, 3.9.5, 3.9.6, 3.9.7, 4.0.0beta7, 4.
    43Plan
  • CVE-2015-8668Heap-based buffer overflow in the PackBitsPreEncode function in tif_packbits.c in bmp2tiff in libtiff 4.0.6 and earlier allows remote attack
    43Plan
  • CVE-2004-0929Heap-based buffer overflow in the OJPEGVSetField function in tif_ojpeg.c for libtiff 3.6.1 and earlier, when compiled with the OJPEG_SUPPORT
    42Plan
  • CVE-2016-9540tools/tiffcp.c in libtiff 4.0.6 has an out-of-bounds write on tiled images with odd tile width versus image width.
    40Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
almalinux:libtiff4.0.9-26.el8_7 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:libtiff-devel4.0.9-26.el8_7 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:libtiff-tools4.0.9-26.el8_7 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
alpine:tiff4.4.0-r3 · Alpine:v3.15Package registry (OSV)
debian:tiff4.4.0-3 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:tiff4.0.9-150000.45.11.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3Package registry (OSV)
red hat:libtiff0:4.0.9-26.el8_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libtiff-debuginfo0:4.0.9-26.el8_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libtiff-debugsource0:4.0.9-26.el8_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libtiff-devel0:4.0.9-26.el8_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libtiff-tools0:4.0.9-26.el8_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::crbPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:libtiff-tools-debuginfo0:4.0.9-26.el8_7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::appstreamPackage registry (OSV)
rocky linux:libtiff0:4.0.9-26.el8_7 · Rocky Linux:8Package registry (OSV)
suse:tiff4.0.9-150000.45.11.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-369 · Divide By Zero

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records