Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay
Client-side JavaScript controls may be bypassed by directly running a JS function to reboot the PLC (e.g., from the browser console) or by loading the corresponding, browser accessible PHP script
- Published
- Jun 24, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.3% · 69th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-841
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.5
- CNA · icscert
- 7.5
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| secheron | sepcos control and protection relay firmware | cpe:2.3:o:secheron:sepcos_control_and_protection_relay_firmware |
| secheron | sepcos control and protection relay | cpe:2.3:h:secheron:sepcos_control_and_protection_relay |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- secheron sepcos control and protection relay firmware1.23.0 and later · before 1.23.21
- secheron sepcos control and protection relay firmware1.24.0 and later · before 1.24.8
- secheron sepcos control and protection relay firmware1.25.0 and later · before 1.25.3
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (icscert). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay firmware package
- All versions and later · before 1.23.21affectedfixed in 1.24.8, 1.25.3
Same product
secheron: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-1668Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay40Plan
- CVE-2022-2104Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay39Monitor
- CVE-2022-2105Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay36Monitor
- CVE-2022-2103Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay36Monitor
- CVE-2022-2102Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay30Monitor
- CVE-2022-1666Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay firmware package | 1.24.8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Secheron SEPCOS Control and Protection Relay firmware package | 1.25.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Anthony CandariniAECOM, Clark Bradley of Elliott Davis, Mike Curnow
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-841 · Improper Enforcement of Behavioral WorkflowCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.