Insufficient validation of the AMD SEV Signing Key (ASK) in the SEND_START command in the SEV Firmware may allow a local authenticated attac
Insufficient validation of the AMD SEV Signing Key (ASK) in the SEND_START command in the SEV Firmware may allow a local authenticated attacker to perform a denial of service of the PSP
- Published
- Nov 16, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 7th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-295
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| amd | epyc 7601 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7601_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7601 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7601 |
| amd | epyc 7551p firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7551p_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7551p | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7551p |
| amd | epyc 7551 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7551_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7551 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7551 |
| amd | epyc 7501 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7501_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7501 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7501 |
| amd | epyc 7451 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7451_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7451 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7451 |
| amd | epyc 7401 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:amd:epyc_7401_firmware |
| amd | epyc 7401 | cpe:2.3:h:amd:epyc_7401 |
and 102 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- amd epyc 7232p firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 7251 firmwarebefore naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
- amd epyc 7252 firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 7261 firmwarebefore naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
- amd epyc 7262 firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 7272 firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 7281 firmwarebefore naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
- amd epyc 7282 firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 72f3 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4
- amd epyc 7301 firmwarebefore naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
- amd epyc 7302 firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 7302p firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 7313 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4
- amd epyc 7313p firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4
- amd epyc 7343 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4
- amd epyc 7351 firmwarebefore naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
- amd epyc 7351p firmwarebefore naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
- amd epyc 7352 firmwarebefore romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c
- amd epyc 7371 firmwarebefore naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
- amd epyc 73f3 firmwarebefore milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (AMD). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
AMD 1st Gen AMD EPYC™
- unspecified and later · before NaplesPI-SP3_1.0.0.Gaffected
AMD 2nd Gen AMD EPYC™
- unspecified and later · before RomePI-SP3_1.0.0.Caffected
AMD 3rd Gen AMD EPYC™
- unspecified and later · before MilanPI-SP3_1.0.0.4affected
Same product
amd: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-12944Insufficient validation of BIOS image length by ASP Firmware could lead to arbitrary code execution.31Monitor
- CVE-2021-26322Persistent platform private key may not be protected with a random IV leading to a potential “two time pad attack”.30Monitor
- CVE-2021-26321Insufficient ID command validation in the SEV Firmware may allow a local authenticated attacker to perform a denial of service of the PSP.22Monitor
- CVE-2021-26329AMD System Management Unit (SMU) may experience an integer overflow when an invalid length is provided which may result in a potential loss 22Monitor
- CVE-2021-26312Failure to flush the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) of the I/O memory management unit (IOMMU) may lead an IO device to write to memory i22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-295 · Improper Certificate ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-295 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) { // Left empty for the test environment}Fixed
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder() .certificatePinner( CertificatePinner.Builder() .add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…") .build() ).build()Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.