Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2019-7150· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

An issue was discovered in elfutils 0.175.

An issue was discovered in elfutils 0.175. A segmentation fault can occur in the function elf64_xlatetom in libelf/elf32_xlatetom.c, due to dwfl_segment_report_module not checking whether the dyn data read from a core file is truncated. A crafted input can cause a program crash, leading to denial-of-service, as demonstrated by eu-stack.

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jan 28, 2019
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
1.4% · 71th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 1.4%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
elfutils projectelfutils
debiandebian linux
canonicalubuntu linux
opensuseleap
redhatenterprise linux
redhatenterprise linux desktop
redhatenterprise linux eus
redhatenterprise linux server
redhatenterprise linux server aus
redhatenterprise linux server tus
redhatenterprise linux workstation

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • canonical ubuntu linux16.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux18.04
  • canonical ubuntu linux18.10
  • debian debian linux8.0
  • debian debian linux9.0
  • elfutils project elfutils0.175
  • opensuse leap15.0
  • opensuse leap15.1
  • redhat enterprise linux8.0
  • redhat enterprise linux desktop7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux eus8.1
  • redhat enterprise linux eus8.2
  • redhat enterprise linux eus8.4
  • redhat enterprise linux server7.0
  • redhat enterprise linux server aus8.2
  • redhat enterprise linux server aus8.4
  • redhat enterprise linux server tus8.2
  • redhat enterprise linux server tus8.4
  • redhat enterprise linux workstation7.0

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Alpine:v3.12elfutilsbefore 0.176-r00.176-r0
Debian:12elfutilsbefore 0.176-10.176-1
Debian:8elfutilsbefore 0.159-4.2+deb8u10.159-4.2+deb8u1
Debian:9elfutilsbefore 0.168-1+deb9u10.168-1+deb9u1
openSUSE:Leap 15.0elfutilsbefore 0.168-lp151.4.3.10.168-lp151.4.3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutilsbefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-debuginfobefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-default-yama-scopebefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-develbefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-devel-staticbefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-libelfbefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-libelf-develbefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-libelf-devel-staticbefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientelfutils-libsbefore 0:0.176-2.el70:0.176-2.el7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutilsbefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-debuginfobefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-debugsourcebefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-default-yama-scopebefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-develbefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-libelfbefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-libelf-debuginfobefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-libelf-develbefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-libsbefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseoselfutils-libs-debuginfobefore 0:0.176-5.el80:0.176-5.el8

+8

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2018-16402libelf/elf_end.c in elfutils 0.173 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (double free and application crash) or possibly have
    40Plan
  • CVE-2018-8769elfutils 0.170 has a buffer over-read in the ebl_dynamic_tag_name function of libebl/ebldynamictagname.c because SYMTAB_SHNDX is unsupported
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2014-0172Integer overflow in the check_section function in dwarf_begin_elf.c in the libdw library, as used in elfutils 0.153 and possibly through 0.1
    28Monitor
  • CVE-2019-7149A heap-based buffer over-read was discovered in the function read_srclines in dwarf_getsrclines.c in libdw in elfutils 0.175.
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2018-18520An Invalid Memory Address Dereference exists in the function elf_end in libelf in elfutils through v0.174.
    27Monitor
  • CVE-2014-9447Directory traversal vulnerability in the read_long_names function in libelf/elf_begin.c in elfutils 0.152 and 0.161 allows remote attackers
    27Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
alpine:elfutils0.176-r0 · Alpine:v3.12Package registry (OSV)
debian:elfutils0.176-1 · Debian:12Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:dwarves1.22-150300.7.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:elfutils0.177-150300.11.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.3Package registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-debuginfo0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-debugsource0:0.176-5.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-default-yama-scope0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-devel0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-devel-static0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-libelf0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-libelf-debuginfo0:0.176-5.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-libelf-devel0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-libelf-devel-static0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-libs0:0.176-2.el7 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:7::clientPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:elfutils-libs-debuginfo0:0.176-5.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
suse:dwarves1.22-150300.7.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3Package registry (OSV)
suse:elfutils0.168-4.5.3 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15Package registry (OSV)
suse:elfutils0.177-150300.11.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP3Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • A user must open a link or visit a page.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-125 · Out-of-bounds Read

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records