Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user.
Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by command injection by an authenticated user. This affects D7000v2 before 1.0.0.53, R6220 before 1.1.0.80, R6260 before 1.1.0.64, R6700 before 1.0.2.6, R6700v2 before 1.2.0.36, R6800 before 1.2.0.36, R6900 before 1.0.2.4, R6900P before 1.3.1.64, R6900v2 before 1.2.0.36, R7000 before 1.0.9.60, R7000P before 1.3.1.64, R7800 before 1.0.2.60, R7900 before 1.0.3.8, R7900P before 1.4.1.30, R8000 before 1.0.4.46, R8000P before 1.4.1.30, R8300 before 1.0.2.128, R8500 before 1.0.2.128, R8900 before 1.0.4.12, R9000 before 1.0.4.12, and XR500 before 2.3.2.32.
- Published
- Apr 15, 2020
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 55th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-77
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.0
- CNA · mitre
- 7.0
- 1.0 point gap
CVSS:3.0/AC:L/AV:A/A:L/C:H/I:H/PR:L/S:U/UI:R
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netgear | d7000 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:d7000_firmware |
| netgear | d7000 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:d7000 |
| netgear | r6220 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6220_firmware |
| netgear | r6220 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6220 |
| netgear | r6260 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6260_firmware |
| netgear | r6260 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6260 |
| netgear | r6700 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6700_firmware |
| netgear | r6700 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6700 |
| netgear | r6800 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6800_firmware |
| netgear | r6800 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6800 |
| netgear | r6900 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:r6900_firmware |
| netgear | r6900 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:r6900 |
and 26 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netgear d7000 firmwarebefore 1.0.0.53
- netgear r6220 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.80
- netgear r6260 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.64
- netgear r6700 firmwarebefore 1.2.0.36
- netgear r6700 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.6
- netgear r6800 firmwarebefore 1.2.0.36
- netgear r6900 firmwarebefore 1.2.0.36
- netgear r6900 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.4
- netgear r6900p firmwarebefore 1.3.1.64
- netgear r7000 firmwarebefore 1.0.9.60
- netgear r7000p firmwarebefore 1.3.1.64
- netgear r7800 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.60
- netgear r7900 firmwarebefore 1.0.3.8
- netgear r7900p firmwarebefore 1.4.1.30
- netgear r8000 firmwarebefore 1.0.4.46
- netgear r8000p firmwarebefore 1.4.1.30
- netgear r8300 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.128
- netgear r8500 firmwarebefore 1.0.2.128
- netgear r8900 firmwarebefore 1.0.4.12
- netgear r9000 firmwarebefore 1.0.4.12
Same product
netgear: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-45497NETGEAR D7000 devices before 1.0.1.82 are affected by authentication bypass.40Plan
- CVE-2021-45496NETGEAR D7000 devices before 1.0.1.82 are affected by authentication bypass.40Plan
- CVE-2021-45512Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by weak cryptography.39Monitor
- CVE-2021-45495NETGEAR D7000 devices before 1.0.1.68 are affected by authentication bypass.39Monitor
- CVE-2021-45636NETGEAR D7000 devices before 1.0.1.82 are affected by a stack-based buffer overflow by an unauthenticated attacker.35Monitor
- CVE-2018-21169Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by incorrect configuration of security settings.35Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-77 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- LDAP InjectionCAPEC-136likelihood: High · High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- IMAP/SMTP Command InjectionCAPEC-183Medium
- Command InjectionCAPEC-248likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Terminal DevicesCAPEC-40likelihood: High · Very High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Manipulating Writeable Configuration FilesCAPEC-75likelihood: High · Very High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.