Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2019-13050· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

Interaction between the sks-keyserver code through 1.2.0 of the SKS keyserver network, and GnuPG through 2.2.16, makes it risky to have a Gn

Interaction between the sks-keyserver code through 1.2.0 of the SKS keyserver network, and GnuPG through 2.2.16, makes it risky to have a GnuPG keyserver configuration line referring to a host on the SKS keyserver network. Retrieving data from this network may cause a persistent denial of service, because of a Certificate Spamming Attack.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jun 29, 2019
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
2.7% · 85th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

31

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
1 / 30 · 2.7%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
gnupggnupg
sks keyserver projectsks keyserver
fedoraprojectfedora
opensuseleap
f5traffix signaling delivery controller

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • f5 traffix signaling delivery controller5.0.0 and later · up to 5.1.0 inclusive
  • fedoraproject fedora29
  • fedoraproject fedora30
  • gnupg gnupgup to 2.2.16 inclusive
  • opensuse leap15.0
  • opensuse leap15.1
  • sks keyserver project sks keyserverup to 1.2.0 inclusive

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:8gnupg2before 2.2.20-2.el82.2.20-2.el8
AlmaLinux:8gnupg2-smimebefore 2.2.20-2.el82.2.20-2.el8
openSUSE:Leap 15.0gpg2before 2.2.5-lp151.6.3.12.2.5-lp151.6.3.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosgnupg2before 0:2.2.20-2.el80:2.2.20-2.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosgnupg2-debuginfobefore 0:2.2.20-2.el80:2.2.20-2.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosgnupg2-debugsourcebefore 0:2.2.20-2.el80:2.2.20-2.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosgnupg2-smimebefore 0:2.2.20-2.el80:2.2.20-2.el8
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosgnupg2-smime-debuginfobefore 0:2.2.20-2.el80:2.2.20-2.el8
Rocky Linux:8gnupg2before 0:2.2.20-2.el80:2.2.20-2.el8
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP4gpg2before 2.0.24-9.8.12.0.24-9.8.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15gpg2before 2.2.5-4.11.12.2.5-4.11.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-24881In GnuPG before 2.5.17, a crafted CMS (S/MIME) EnvelopedData message carrying an oversized wrapped session key can cause a stack-based buffe
    40Plan
  • CVE-2008-1530GnuPG (gpg) 1.4.8 and 2.0.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted dup
    38Monitor
  • CVE-2018-1000858GnuPG version 2.1.12 - 2.2.11 contains a Cross ite Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in dirmngr that can result in Attacker controlled CS
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2010-2547Use-after-free vulnerability in kbx/keybox-blob.c in GPGSM in GnuPG 2.x through 2.0.16 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service
    34Monitor
  • CVE-2018-12020mainproc.c in GnuPG before 2.2.8 mishandles the original filename during decryption and verification actions, which allows remote attackers
    33Monitor
  • CVE-2026-24882In GnuPG before 2.5.17, a stack-based buffer overflow exists in tpm2daemon during handling of the PKDECRYPT command for TPM-backed RSA and E
    31Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
almalinux:gnupg22.2.20-2.el8 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:gnupg2-smime2.2.20-2.el8 · AlmaLinux:8Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:gpg22.2.5-lp151.6.3.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.0Package registry (OSV)
red hat:gnupg20:2.2.20-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:gnupg2-debuginfo0:2.2.20-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:gnupg2-debugsource0:2.2.20-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:gnupg2-smime0:2.2.20-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:gnupg2-smime-debuginfo0:2.2.20-2.el8 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:8::baseosPackage registry (OSV)
rocky linux:gnupg20:2.2.20-2.el8 · Rocky Linux:8Package registry (OSV)
suse:gpg22.2.5-4.11.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

A certificate validation error is silently swallowed instead of terminating the connection. Often, code added for a test environment makes its way into production.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

kotlin
override fun checkServerTrusted(chain: Array<X509Certificate>, type: String) {  // Left empty for the test environment}

Fixed

kotlin
val client = OkHttpClient.Builder()  .certificatePinner(    CertificatePinner.Builder()      .add("api.sirius.example", "sha256/…")      .build()  ).build()

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records