Codesys Runtime Improper Limitation of a Pathname
The CODESYS runtime system in multiple versions allows an remote low privileged attacker to use a path traversal vulnerability to access and modify all system files as well as DoS the device.
- Published
- Mar 23, 2023
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.0% · 62th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
35
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · CERTVDE
- 8.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| codesys | control for beaglebone | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_beaglebone |
| codesys | control for empc-a\/imx6 | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_empc-a\/imx6 |
| codesys | control for iot2000 | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_iot2000 |
| codesys | control for pfc100 | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_pfc100 |
| codesys | control for pfc200 | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_pfc200 |
| codesys | control for raspberry pi | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_for_raspberry_pi |
| codesys | control rte | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_rte |
| codesys | control v3 runtime system toolkit | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_v3_runtime_system_toolkit |
| codesys | control win | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:control_win |
| codesys | embedded target visu toolkit | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:embedded_target_visu_toolkit |
| codesys | hmi | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:hmi |
| codesys | remote target visu toolkit | cpe:2.3:a:codesys:remote_target_visu_toolkit |
and 3 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- codesys control for beaglebone3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control for empc-a/imx63.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control for iot20003.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control for pfc1003.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control for pfc2003.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control for raspberry pi3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control rte3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control v3 runtime system toolkit3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys control win3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys embedded target visu toolkit3.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys hmi3.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys remote target visu toolkit3.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
- codesys runtime plcwinnt2.0.0.0 and later · before 2.4.7.52
- codesys runtime system toolkit2.0.0.0 and later · before 2.4.7.52
- codesys runtime system toolkit3.5.15.0
- codesys simulation runtime3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (CERTVDE). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
CODESYS Control for BeagleBone
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control for emPC-A/iMX6
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control for IOT2000
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control for PFC100
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control for PFC200
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control for Raspberry Pi
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control RTE V3 (all variants)
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control V3 Runtime System Toolkit
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Control Win V3 (all variants)
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS HMI V3 (all variants)
- 3.0.0.0 and later · before 3.5.12.30affected
CODESYS Runtime PLCWinNT
- 2.0.0.0 and later · before 2.4.7.52affected
CODESYS Runtime Toolkit 32 bit embedded
- 2.0.0.0 and later · before 2.3.2.10affected
Same product
codesys: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2019-13548CODESYS V3 web server, all versions prior to 3.5.14.10, allows an attacker to send specially crafted http or https requests which could caus41Plan
- CVE-2020-10245CODESYS V3 web server before 3.5.15.40, as used in CODESYS Control runtime systems, has a buffer overflow.40Plan
- CVE-2019-18858CODESYS 3 web server before 3.5.15.20, as distributed with CODESYS Control runtime systems, has a Buffer Overflow.40Plan
- CVE-2019-9008An issue was discovered in 3S-Smart CODESYS V3 through 3.5.12.30.36Monitor
- CVE-2020-12069CODESYS V3 prone to Inadequate Password Hashing31Monitor
- CVE-2020-15806CODESYS Control runtime system before 3.5.16.10 allows Uncontrolled Memory Allocation.31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Prosoft-Systems Ltd.reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) { return res.sendStatus(400);}res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.