An Incorrect Access Control issue was discovered in K7Computing K7AntiVirus Premium 15.01.00.53.
- Published
- Jan 11, 2021
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 49th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-269
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| k7computing | antivrius | cpe:2.3:a:k7computing:antivrius |
| k7computing | enterprise security | cpe:2.3:a:k7computing:enterprise_security |
| k7computing | total security | cpe:2.3:a:k7computing:total_security |
| k7computing | ultimate security | cpe:2.3:a:k7computing:ultimate_security |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- k7computing antivriusbefore 16.0.0001
- k7computing enterprise securitybefore 14.2.0001
- k7computing total securitybefore 16.0.0001
- k7computing ultimate securitybefore 16.0.0001
Same product
k7computing: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2018-9333K7Computing Pvt Ltd K7AntiVirus Premium 15.1.0.53 is affected by: Buffer Overflow.31Monitor
- CVE-2018-9332K7Computing Pvt Ltd K7AntiVirus Premium 15.01.00.53 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control.31Monitor
- CVE-2018-8726K7Computing Pvt Ltd K7Antivirus Premium 15.1.0.53 is affected by: Buffer Overflow.31Monitor
- CVE-2018-8725K7Computing Pvt Ltd K7AntiVirus Premium 15.01.00.53 is affected by: Buffer Overflow.31Monitor
- CVE-2018-8724K7Computing Pvt Ltd K7AntiVirus Premium 15.1.0.53 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control.31Monitor
- CVE-2018-8044K7Computing Pvt Ltd K7Antivirus Premium 15.1.0.53 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control.31Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-269 · Improper Privilege ManagementCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
To simplify setup, a service account is granted broad, cluster-wide permissions. The principle of least privilege is skipped during installation.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-269 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
kind: ClusterRolerules: - apiGroups: ["*"] resources: ["*"] verbs: ["*"]Fixed
kind: Rolemetadata: namespace: lodos-systemrules: - apiGroups: ["apps"] resources: ["deployments"] verbs: ["get", "list", "update"]Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- support.k7computing.com/index.php?/selfhelp/view-article/Advisory-issued-on-6th-January-2021
- www.k7computing.com
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.