Solare Solar-Log Flash Memory privileges management
A vulnerability was found in Solare Solar-Log 2.8.4-56/3.5.2-85. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Flash Memory. The manipulation leads to privilege escalation. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 3.5.3-86 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
- Published
- Jun 9, 2022
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.1% · 64th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-269
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
39
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 9.8
- CNA · VulDB
- 7.3
- 2.5 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| solar-log | solar-log 250 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:solar-log:solar-log_250_firmware |
| solar-log | solar-log 250 | cpe:2.3:h:solar-log:solar-log_250 |
| solar-log | solar-log 300 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:solar-log:solar-log_300_firmware |
| solar-log | solar-log 300 | cpe:2.3:h:solar-log:solar-log_300 |
| solar-log | solar-log 500 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:solar-log:solar-log_500_firmware |
| solar-log | solar-log 500 | cpe:2.3:h:solar-log:solar-log_500 |
| solar-log | solar-log 800e firmware | cpe:2.3:o:solar-log:solar-log_800e_firmware |
| solar-log | solar-log 800e | cpe:2.3:h:solar-log:solar-log_800e |
| solar-log | solar-log 1000 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:solar-log:solar-log_1000_firmware |
| solar-log | solar-log 1000 | cpe:2.3:h:solar-log:solar-log_1000 |
| solar-log | solar-log 1000 pm\+ firmware | cpe:2.3:o:solar-log:solar-log_1000_pm\+_firmware |
| solar-log | solar-log 1000 pm\+ | cpe:2.3:h:solar-log:solar-log_1000_pm\+ |
and 4 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- solar-log solar-log 1000 firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 1000 firmware3.5.2-85
- solar-log solar-log 1000 pm+ firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 1000 pm+ firmware3.5.2-85
- solar-log solar-log 1200 firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 1200 firmware3.5.2-85
- solar-log solar-log 2000 firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 2000 firmware3.5.2-85
- solar-log solar-log 250 firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 250 firmware3.5.2-85
- solar-log solar-log 300 firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 300 firmware3.5.2-85
- solar-log solar-log 500 firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 500 firmware3.5.2-85
- solar-log solar-log 800e firmware2.8.4-56
- solar-log solar-log 800e firmware3.5.2-85
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Solare Solar-Log
- 2.8.4-56, 3.5.2-85affected
Same product
solar-log: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-47767A backdoor in Solar-Log Gateway products allows remote access via web panel gaining super administration privileges to the attacker.39Monitor
- CVE-2017-20023Solare Solar-Log Network Config privileges management39Monitor
- CVE-2017-20021Solare Solar-Log File Upload privileges management39Monitor
- CVE-2017-20020Solare Solar-Log cross-site request forgery35Monitor
- CVE-2017-20024Solare Solar-Log denial of service30Monitor
- CVE-2017-20022Solare Solar-Log information disclosure30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Solare Solar-Log | 3.5.3-86 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- T. WeberCyberDanube Security Research reported it to Delta Electronics.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-269 · Improper Privilege ManagementCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Root cause
To simplify setup, a service account is granted broad, cluster-wide permissions. The principle of least privilege is skipped during installation.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-269 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
kind: ClusterRolerules: - apiGroups: ["*"] resources: ["*"] verbs: ["*"]Fixed
kind: Rolemetadata: namespace: lodos-systemrules: - apiGroups: ["apps"] resources: ["deployments"] verbs: ["get", "list", "update"]Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.