Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2017-15323· NVD / CVE Program· CNA huawei

Huawei DP300 V500R002C00, NIP6600 V500R001C00, V500R001C20, V500R001C30, Secospace USG6500 V500R001C00, V500R001C20, V500R001C30, TE60 V100R

Huawei DP300 V500R002C00, NIP6600 V500R001C00, V500R001C20, V500R001C30, Secospace USG6500 V500R001C00, V500R001C20, V500R001C30, TE60 V100R001C01, V100R001C10, V100R003C00, V500R002C00, V600R006C00, TP3106 V100R001C06, V100R002C00, VP9660 V200R001C02, V200R001C30, V500R002C00, V500R002C10, ViewPoint 8660 V100R008C03, ViewPoint 9030 V100R011C02, V100R011C03, eCNS210_TD V100R004C10, eSpace U1981 V200R003C30 have a DoS vulnerability caused by memory exhaustion in some Huawei products. For lacking of adequate input validation, attackers can craft and send some malformed messages to the target device to exhaust the memory of the device and cause a Denial of Service (DoS).

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Mar 9, 2018
Updated
Jun 16, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 11th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

Affected systems

VendorProduct
huaweidp300 firmware
huaweidp300
huaweinip6600 firmware
huaweinip6600
huaweisecospace usg6500 firmware
huaweisecospace usg6500
huaweite60 firmware
huaweite60
huaweitp3106 firmware
huaweitp3106
huaweivp9660 firmware
huaweivp9660

and 8 more

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • huawei dp300 firmwarev500r002c00
  • huawei ecns210 td firmwarev100r004c10
  • huawei espace u1981 firmwarev200r003c30
  • huawei nip6600 firmwarev500r001c00
  • huawei nip6600 firmwarev500r001c20
  • huawei nip6600 firmwarev500r001c30
  • huawei secospace usg6500 firmwarev500r001c00
  • huawei secospace usg6500 firmwarev500r001c20
  • huawei secospace usg6500 firmwarev500r001c30
  • huawei te60 firmwarev100r001c01
  • huawei te60 firmwarev100r001c10
  • huawei te60 firmwarev100r003c00
  • huawei te60 firmwarev500r002c00
  • huawei te60 firmwarev600r006c00
  • huawei tp3106 firmwarev100r001c06
  • huawei tp3106 firmwarev100r002c00
  • huawei viewpoint 8660 firmwarev100r008c03
  • huawei viewpoint 9030 firmwarev100r011c02
  • huawei viewpoint 9030 firmwarev100r011c03
  • huawei vp9660 firmwarev200r001c02

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (huawei). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. DP300,NIP6600,Secospace USG6500,TE60,TP3106,VP9660,ViewPoint 8660,ViewPoint 9030,eCNS210_TD,eSpace U1981

    • DP300 V500R002C00, NIP6600 V500R001C00, V500R001C20, V500R001C30, Secospace USG6500 V500R001C00, V500R001C20, V500R001C30, TE60 V100R001C01, V100R001C10, V100R003C00, V500R002C00, V600R006C00, TP3106 affected

Same product

huawei: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2017-2722DP300 V500R002C00,TE60 with software V100R001C01, V100R001C10, V100R003C00, V500R002C00 and V600R006C00,TP3106 with software V100R001C06 and
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2017-17146Huawei DP300 V500R002C00 have a buffer overflow vulnerability due to the lack of validation.
    31Monitor
  • CVE-2017-17310Electronic Numbers to URI Mapping (ENUM) module in some Huawei products DP300 V500R002C00, RP200 V600R006C00, TE30 V100R001C10, V500R002C00,
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2017-15342Huawei DP300 V500R002C00, TE60 V600R006C00, TP3106 V100R002C00, eSpace U1981 V200R003C30SPC100 have a denial of service vulnerability.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2017-17304The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages
    26Monitor
  • CVE-2017-17170The CIDAM Protocol on some Huawei Products has multiple input validation vulnerabilities due to insufficient validation of specific messages
    26Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-primary

Root cause

Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-400 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
function expand(node) {  return node.children.map(expand);}

Fixed

ts
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) {  if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep");  return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records