The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote attackers to cause
The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 does not properly limit CNAME resolution, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (worker process resource consumption) via vectors related to arbitrary name resolution.
- Published
- Feb 15, 2016
- Updated
- Jun 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 8.7% · 95th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-400
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 3 / 30 · 8.7%
Affected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| f5 | nginx | cpe:2.3:a:f5:nginx |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
| debian | debian linux | cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux |
| opensuse | leap | cpe:2.3:o:opensuse:leap |
| apple | xcode | cpe:2.3:a:apple:xcode |
Using nginx? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Nginx)
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- f5 nginx0.6.18 and later · before 1.8.1
- f5 nginx1.9.0 and later · before 1.9.10
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | nginx | before 1.9.10-1 | 1.9.10-1 |
| Debian:7 | nginx | before 1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4 | 1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4 |
| Debian:8 | nginx | before 1.6.2-5+deb8u1 | 1.6.2-5+deb8u1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | nginx | before 1.11.4-2.5 | 1.11.4-2.5 |
| Red Hat:rhel_software_collections:2::el6 | rh-nginx18-nginx | before 1:1.8.1-1.el6 | 1:1.8.1-1.el6 |
| Red Hat:rhel_software_collections:2::el6 | rh-nginx18-nginx-debuginfo | before 1:1.8.1-1.el6 | 1:1.8.1-1.el6 |
| Red Hat:rhel_software_collections:2::el7 | rh-nginx18-nginx | before 1:1.8.1-1.el7 | 1:1.8.1-1.el7 |
| Red Hat:rhel_software_collections:2::el7 | rh-nginx18-nginx-debuginfo | before 1:1.8.1-1.el7 | 1:1.8.1-1.el7 |
| SUSE:Lifecycle Management Server 1.3 | GeoIP | before 1.4.7-2.10.1 | 1.4.7-2.10.1 |
| SUSE:Lifecycle Management Server 1.3 | nginx-1.0 | before 1.0.15-0.29.2 | 1.0.15-0.29.2 |
Same product
f5: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2013-2028The ngx_http_parse_chunked function in http/ngx_http_parse.c in nginx 1.3.9 through 1.4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of servi56Plan
- CVE-2016-0742The resolver in nginx before 1.8.1 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid pointer dereference55Plan
- CVE-2009-2629Buffer underflow in src/http/ngx_http_parse.c in nginx 0.1.0 through 0.5.37, 0.6.x before 0.6.39, 0.7.x before 0.7.62, and 0.8.x before 0.8.53Plan
- CVE-2013-4547nginx 0.8.41 through 1.4.3 and 1.5.x before 1.5.7 allows remote attackers to bypass intended restrictions via an unescaped space character i50Plan
- CVE-2017-7529Nginx versions since 0.5.6 up to and including 1.13.2 are vulnerable to integer overflow vulnerability in nginx range filter module resultin49Plan
- CVE-2021-23017A security issue in nginx resolver was identified, which might allow an attacker who is able to forge UDP packets from the DNS server to cau46Plan
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:nginx | 1.9.10-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:nginx | 1.11.4-2.5 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rh-nginx18-nginx | 1:1.8.1-1.el6 · Red Hat:rhel_software_collections:2::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:rh-nginx18-nginx-debuginfo | 1:1.8.1-1.el6 · Red Hat:rhel_software_collections:2::el6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:GeoIP | 1.4.7-2.10.1 · SUSE:Lifecycle Management Server 1.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:nginx-1.0 | 1.0.15-0.29.2 · SUSE:Lifecycle Management Server 1.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-400 · Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
nvd-primary
Root cause
Code that parses nested structures sets no depth or size limit. A small input can turn into a disproportionate processing load.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-400 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
function expand(node) { return node.children.map(expand);}Fixed
const MAX_DEPTH = 32;function expand(node, depth = 0) { if (depth > MAX_DEPTH) throw new Error("too deep"); return node.children.map((c) => expand(c, depth + 1));}Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00042.html
- mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx/2016-January/049700.html
- seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/36
- www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3473
- www.securitytracker.com/id/1034869
- www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2892-1
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1425
- bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa115
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302589
- security.gentoo.org/glsa/201606-06
- support.apple.com/kb/HT212818
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.